Ticks: A Chronicle of an Ancient Arthropod and Its Enduring Global Impact

I. Introduction: The Enduring Enigma of Ticks

A. The Pervasive Presence and Impact of Ticks

Ticks are highly specialized, obligate ectoparasites, meaning they must feed on the blood of other animals to survive. They belong to the order Ixodida and are classified as arachnids, sharing ancestry with spiders and mites, and are characterized by eight legs in their nymphal and adult stages.¹ These remarkably resilient arthropods have a global distribution, thriving in a multitude of environments, their presence and abundance often dictated by specific environmental conditions such as humidity and temperature.²

Their significance, however, extends far beyond their biological classification. Ticks are of immense medical and veterinary importance worldwide. They are notorious vectors of disease, surpassed only by mosquitoes in their capacity to transmit a wide array of pathogens—including bacteria, viruses, and protozoa—to both humans and a diverse range of animal hosts.² This ability to bridge the gap between wildlife reservoirs and human or domestic animal populations places them at the center of numerous public health concerns.

Their often inconspicuous nature, coupled with bites that frequently go unnoticed and diseases that may only manifest weeks or months later ⁶, contributes to a public perception that can dangerously underestimate the actual risk. This “out of sight, out of mind” phenomenon presents a significant challenge for public health awareness, as the connection between a past tick encounter and subsequent illness may not be immediately apparent, potentially complicating diagnosis and delaying crucial treatment. Despite their diminutive physical size, typically only a few millimeters in length, especially when unengorged ¹, ticks wield a disproportionately massive influence on global health. They are responsible for transmitting a plethora of serious, debilitating, and sometimes fatal diseases.³ The economic repercussions, encompassing healthcare costs, livestock losses, and reduced productivity, are substantial, highlighting how these tiny organisms can act as critical keystones in disease ecology.

B. Purpose and Scope of the Report

This report aims to serve as an exhaustive and accessible online resource, delving into the multifaceted world of ticks. It embarks on a comprehensive journey, tracing their ancient origins and charting their evolutionary saga. The report will meticulously examine their complex biology, intricate behaviors, and the sophisticated mechanisms they employ for survival and reproduction. A significant portion will be dedicated to assessing their current and profound impact on public and animal health, with a particular focus on the situation in Europe and the Netherlands, regions for which considerable data exists. Finally, the report will look to the horizon, exploring future challenges posed by factors like climate change, alongside the promising scientific innovations in diagnostics, vaccine development, and integrated control strategies designed to mitigate the threats posed by these ancient and enduring arthropods.

II. Echoes of the Ancient World: The Origins and Evolutionary Saga of Ticks

A. The Fossil Record: Peering into Deep Time

The evolutionary narrative of ticks is one of ancient lineage, with fossil evidence indicating their presence on Earth since the age of dinosaurs.⁸ Analyses of these ancient remnants, though providing limited direct clues about the earliest phases of tick evolution, do not contradict prevailing hypotheses. These hypotheses, largely formulated from total-evidence approaches that combine morphological characteristics with molecular data, situate the origin of ticks within the Cretaceous period, a vast expanse of time stretching from approximately 65 to 146 million years ago (mya).¹⁰ This timeline places their emergence well within the era of reptilian dominance, long before the significant radiation of mammals.

It is believed that the Tertiary period, spanning from 5 to 65 mya, was a particularly crucial epoch for the evolution and dispersal of most modern tick genera.¹⁰ As mammals and birds diversified and spread across the globe during this period, ticks likely co-evolved and radiated alongside these new potential hosts, adapting to exploit these emerging ecological niches.

Amber, the fossilized resin of ancient trees, has proven to be an invaluable medium for preserving these ancient arthropods, offering glimpses into their past morphology. The majority of fossilized tick specimens have been unearthed from amber deposits in the Baltic region and the Dominican Republic. Some of these remarkable finds, such as a male Ornithodoros (Alectorobius) sp. discovered in Dominican amber, have been dated to approximately 25 million years old.¹¹ The conifer trees that produced such resin were prominent on Earth as far back as the Carboniferous Period, between 280 and 345 mya, underscoring the deep geological timescale involved.¹¹

While the fossil record for ticks is not as complete or continuous as for some other organisms, it remains a vital source of information. These ancient specimens help researchers to discern probable vicariance events—the geographical separation of once-contiguous populations leading to divergent evolution—and to calibrate timelines for the splitting of different tick lineages.¹¹ This fossil-derived data serves as an important complement and calibration tool for molecular clock methods, which estimate divergence times based on rates of genetic mutation. For example, fossil evidence has been instrumental in suggesting that the Hyalomma genus of ticks may have originated around 50 mya, providing a tangible anchor point for molecular phylogenetic studies.¹¹ The relative scarcity of highly informative tick fossils has, in fact, been a significant impetus for the development and increasing reliance on these sophisticated molecular techniques to piece together the complex puzzle of tick evolutionary history.

The remarkable longevity of ticks, surviving through major geological upheavals and mass extinction events that reshaped life on Earth, points to an exceptionally effective and adaptable core biological blueprint. Their fundamental parasitic strategies, such as hematophagy (blood-feeding) and sophisticated host immune evasion, must have been established early and proven robust enough to allow them to persist and thrive across vast stretches of evolutionary time, continually fine-tuning rather than radically overhauling their approach to parasitism.

B. The Tick Family Tree: Diversification and Key Lineages

The order Ixodida, encompassing all ticks, is broadly divided into two main families, each with distinct characteristics: the Ixodidae, commonly known as hard ticks, and the Argasidae, or soft ticks.² This fundamental division reflects major evolutionary divergences in their morphology, life cycles, and ecological adaptations.

Further taxonomic refinement reveals subdivisions within these families. The Argasidae are split into two subfamilies: Argasinae and Ornithodorinae. The Ixodidae are more complex, divided first into the Prostriata, which includes the single genus Ixodes, and the Metastriata, a larger group containing several subfamilies such as Amblyomminae, Haemaphysalinae, Hyalomminae, and Rhipicephalinae.¹¹ These classifications are based on a combination of morphological features, particularly related to their mouthparts and dorsal shielding.

Attempts to date the origins of these major lineages suggest deep evolutionary roots. Some researchers propose that the Argasidae (soft ticks) may have originated as far back as the late Permian or early Triassic period, around 250 mya. The Prostriata (specifically, the Ixodes lineage of hard ticks) are thought to have emerged later, possibly in the early Cretaceous, approximately 145 mya.¹¹ These ancient timelines underscore the long co-evolutionary history ticks have had with their vertebrate hosts.

A multitude of factors are believed to have shaped the evolutionary trajectory of ticks. Biogeography, the study of the geographical distribution of species, has played a significant role, with continental drift and changing landmass connections influencing dispersal and isolation. Ecological specificity, referring to the range of hosts or habitats a tick species can exploit, and the size of available hosts have also been critical in molding the patterns of tick-host associations observed today.¹¹ For example, the evolution of large mammalian herbivores likely provided new opportunities for certain tick lineages to specialize and diversify. While the predominant theory posits that ticks evolved from nest-dwelling predators, alternative hypotheses, such as an origin from scavenger ancestors, have also been proposed, indicating ongoing scientific inquiry into their deepest evolutionary pathways.¹¹

C. An Intimate Dance: Co-evolution with Hosts and Pathogens

The relationship between parasites and their hosts is a powerful engine of biological diversification, and the intricate interactions among ticks, their vertebrate hosts, and the pathogens they transmit provide a compelling example of this co-evolutionary dance.³ This is not a simple one-way interaction but a complex, multi-layered evolutionary game where each participant—tick, host, and pathogen—exerts selective pressures on the others, leading to a dynamic interplay of adaptation and counter-adaptation.

These interactions are characterized by both conflict and, paradoxically, forms of cooperation or mutual exploitation.

Conflict is evident in the constant battle at the tick-host interface. When a tick feeds, it creates a lesion and must actively inhibit the host’s natural defense mechanisms—such as blood clotting (hemostasis), immune responses, and inflammation—to successfully obtain a blood meal. Hosts, in turn, react both locally at the bite site and systemically to tick infestation, attempting to expel the parasite or limit its feeding success.12 Similarly, ticks possess their own defense mechanisms to limit or tolerate pathogen infection, while the pathogens themselves have evolved sophisticated strategies to manipulate the tick’s biological processes. For instance, pathogens may alter tick innate immunity or programmed cell death (apoptosis) to facilitate their own infection, multiplication, and eventual transmission to a new host.12 Pathogens also deploy mechanisms to inhibit the host’s immune response, further complicating the interaction.12

Cooperation, or at least mutually beneficial manipulation, also occurs. Ticks can benefit from hosts by subtly altering host responses at the bite site to promote more efficient feeding. Some pathogens may confer advantages to their tick vectors, such as increased survival rates under certain environmental stresses (e.g., low or high temperatures) or enhanced overall fitness. In these cases, pathogens manipulate tick biology to ensure their own survival and transmission, but critically, they often do so without severely compromising the tick’s feeding ability or reproductive capacity, as the pathogen’s persistence depends on the vector’s success.¹²

A clear illustration of this finely tuned co-evolutionary balance is seen in the relationship between the Ixodes scapularis tick and the bacterium Anaplasma phagocytophilum. This pathogen enhances its infection within the tick by reducing the levels of porins, thereby inhibiting apoptosis in tick cells. This manipulation increases pathogen load but is carefully calibrated not to significantly impair the tick’s feeding performance or reproductive output, thus preserving the tick’s vector capacity. However, these pathogens do not appear to manipulate the levels of other critical tick proteins like subolesin, because a reduction in subolesin could negatively impact both pathogen infection and overall tick performance.¹² This delicate balance ensures the survival and propagation of both the pathogen and its tick vector—a testament to a long history of co-adaptation.

The temporal dimension of this co-evolution is also revealing. Studies using molecular clock analyses estimate that piroplasmids—a group of protozoan parasites including important genera like Babesia and Theileria—diverged approximately 56 mya. This is significantly later than the estimated divergence time of their hard tick hosts, which is placed around 86 mya.³ This timeline suggests that hard ticks were already an established group of parasites before piroplasmids adapted to use them as vectors. Given that the broader phylum to which piroplasmids belong, Apicomplexa, has a much more ancient origin (estimated between 500 and 1100 mya, predating not only ticks but also the major radiations of mammals and birds ³), it appears that an ancestral piroplasmid lineage opportunistically selected these pre-existing hard tick species as suitable vectors. This pattern of host-switching and adaptation is a common theme in parasite evolution. Furthermore, the transmission dynamics show a high degree of genus specificity (certain tick genera transmit certain piroplasmid genera) but a lower degree of species specificity within those genera, allowing for a broader range of potential vector-pathogen pairings once the initial association was established.³ This complex interplay highlights how the tick-host-pathogen triad serves as a dynamic microcosm of evolutionary processes, constantly shaping the diversity and distribution of these organisms.

III. Ticks Through Time: A Historical Chronicle of Human Interaction and Discovery

A. Ancient Encounters: From Prehistory to Early Records

The long history of ticks on Earth means their interactions with vertebrate hosts, including the ancestors of humans, stretch back into deep prehistory. As previously noted, fossilized ticks preserved in amber provide tangible evidence of their existence since the age of dinosaurs, millions of years before humans appeared on the planet.⁸

More direct evidence of ancient human encounters with ticks and the diseases they carry comes from remarkable archaeological finds. One of the most compelling examples is Ötzi the Iceman, whose naturally mummified remains were discovered in the Alps and date back over 5,000 years. Analysis of Ötzi’s genetic material revealed the presence of DNA from Borrelia burgdorferi, the bacterium responsible for Lyme disease.⁸ This discovery is profound, as it unequivocally demonstrates that humans were being exposed to and infected by tick-borne pathogens millennia ago, long before these diseases were clinically described or understood. It paints a picture of tick-borne illnesses as ancient companions to humankind.

B. Early Scientific Glimmers: Documenting Tick-Borne Afflictions

While ancient peoples undoubtedly suffered from tick-borne ailments, the scientific understanding of these conditions began to emerge much later, often through the observations of explorers, physicians, and naturalists. Early accounts, though not always recognizing the tick as the culprit, documented syndromes that are now identifiable as tick-borne diseases. For instance, historical figures like the missionary and explorer Dr. David Livingstone, during his expeditions in Africa in the mid-19th century, recorded his own and his companions’ suffering from illnesses such as soft tick-borne relapsing fever. These early descriptions, while lacking the precision of modern diagnostics, provided valuable initial insights into the nature, symptoms, and geographical occurrence of these afflictions.⁸

A more specific, though initially overlooked, connection between ticks and a particular skin manifestation was made in the late 1800s. The Swedish dermatologist Dr. Arvid Afzelius meticulously described patients presenting with a peculiar, expanding, ring-like rash, which we now recognize as erythema migrans—the hallmark sign of early Lyme disease. Dr. Afzelius astutely hypothesized that this condition was transmitted by the bite of the sheep tick, Ixodes ricinus, a common tick species in Europe.⁸ Although his hypothesis did not gain widespread acceptance at the time, it was a foundational observation that foreshadowed later discoveries by nearly a century. This significant lag between early clinical observation and eventual scientific confirmation is a recurring theme in the history of tick-borne disease research, underscoring the inherent difficulties in linking a cryptic vector and a delayed-onset illness without advanced microbiological and epidemiological tools.

C. Landmark Discoveries: Unveiling Transmission and Disease Agents

The late 19th and 20th centuries witnessed pivotal breakthroughs that fundamentally changed our understanding of ticks and the diseases they transmit.

Theobald Smith’s Breakthrough with Texas Cattle Fever:

A monumental step forward occurred in the United States during the late 1800s. Cattle ranchers faced devastating economic losses when cattle transported from northern states to the south frequently succumbed to a mysterious and fatal illness, while local southern cattle appeared resistant.8 The U.S. government tasked Dr. Theobald Smith, a pioneering bacteriologist and pathologist working with the Bureau of Animal Industry, to investigate this “Texas cattle fever.” Through meticulous research conducted with F.L. Kilbourne, Smith conclusively demonstrated in 1893 that the disease was caused by a protozoan parasite, Babesia bigemina, and, crucially, that this parasite was transmitted by cattle ticks (Boophilus annulatus, now Rhipicephalus annulatus). This was one of the very first scientifically proven instances of an arthropod vector transmitting a pathogenic microorganism, a discovery that even predated similar findings for mosquito-borne diseases like yellow fever and malaria.8 Smith’s work was revolutionary, establishing the concept of vector-borne disease transmission and laying the groundwork for understanding the epidemiology and control of many other infectious diseases in both animals and humans. This achievement illustrated an early, powerful example of how insights from veterinary science can have profound implications for human medicine, a principle now central to the One Health concept.

Lyme Disease Recognition and Identification:

The story of Lyme disease’s modern recognition is a fascinating interplay of astute clinical observation, persistent patient advocacy, and dedicated scientific inquiry.

• Early U.S. Observations: Even before its formal identification, reports of symptoms consistent with what we now know as Lyme disease had appeared in the United States. For example, in the 1920s and 1940s, physicians in Montauk, New York, described a condition nicknamed “Montauk knee,” characterized by mysterious and recurrent joint swelling, particularly in the knee.⁸ These symptoms are now recognized as typical of later-stage, disseminated Lyme disease.
• The Lyme, Connecticut Cluster: The modern chapter of Lyme disease discovery began in the early 1970s in the town of Lyme, Connecticut, and surrounding communities. A mother and artist named Polly Murray became concerned when she noticed an unusual number of children in her neighborhood, including her own, being diagnosed with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis—a relatively rare condition. She herself was experiencing a perplexing array of symptoms, including rashes, headaches, and joint pain.⁹
• Advocacy and Initial Investigation: Convinced that something unusual was happening, Murray persistently brought her concerns to local and state public health officials. Her advocacy was instrumental in prompting an investigation led by Dr. Allen Steere, then a rheumatology fellow at Yale University.⁹ This highlights the critical role that observant individuals and community advocacy can play in initiating scientific investigation into unexplained disease clusters. Dr. Steere and his colleagues began to characterize this new arthritic syndrome, noting its seasonal occurrence and apparent association with rural environments. Initially, a viral cause was suspected, but Dr. Steere eventually made the crucial connection between the symptoms and exposure to ticks.⁹
• The Breakthrough Discovery: The definitive breakthrough came in 1981. Dr. Willy Burgdorfer, an entomologist at the National Institutes of Health’s Rocky Mountain Laboratories who specialized in tick-borne diseases, was re-examining ticks from areas where the mysterious arthritis was prevalent. He successfully isolated spirochete bacteria from the midgut of blacklegged ticks (Ixodes scapularis, also commonly known as deer ticks). He recognized these spirochetes as the likely causative agent of the disease. In his honor, the newly identified bacterium was named Borrelia burgdorferi.⁹ This landmark discovery provided the missing link, confirming that Lyme disease was indeed a tick-borne bacterial infection, validating the suspicions Dr. Afzelius had voiced in Europe decades earlier.

Ongoing Discoveries:

The narrative of tick-borne disease discovery did not end with Lyme disease. In recent decades, scientific advancements in microbiology, molecular biology, and diagnostics have led to the identification and characterization of numerous other novel tick-borne pathogens and diseases.8 Each new discovery serves as a reminder of the complex and evolving threat posed by ticks, emphasizing the continuous need for research, surveillance, and public health preparedness.

IV. The Tick Unveiled: A Comprehensive Look at Biology and Behaviour

Ticks are marvels of parasitic adaptation, their anatomy, lifecycle, and behaviors all finely tuned for a life dependent on blood meals from vertebrate hosts. Understanding these biological intricacies is crucial for comprehending how they transmit diseases and how their impact can be mitigated.

A. Anatomy and Morphology: The Tick’s Toolkit

As arachnids, adult ticks are characterized by eight legs (larvae, however, possess only six) and a lack of antennae, features that distinguish them from insects.¹ Their bodies are typically flattened dorsoventrally, an adaptation that allows them to navigate through host fur or feathers and remain relatively inconspicuous before feeding.¹ Globally, there is a vast diversity, with approximately 850 tick species identified, around 80 of which are found in the United States alone.¹

The two primary families of ticks, Ixodidae (hard ticks) and Argasidae (soft ticks), exhibit significant morphological and behavioral differences, as detailed in Table 1.

Table 1: Comparison of Hard Ticks (Ixodidae) and Soft Ticks (Argasidae)

Feature	Hard Ticks (Ixodidae)	Soft Ticks (Argasidae)
Scutum (Dorsal Shield)	Present; covers entire back in males, anterior portion in females, nymphs, larvae, allowing for engorgement expansion 2	Absent 2
Capitulum (Mouthparts) Location	Anterior, visible from dorsal view 2	Ventral (underneath body), not visible from dorsal view 2
Body Covering	Rigid, chitinous scutum and body wall 2	Leathery, flexible, often wrinkled or mammillated integument 2
Number of Nymphal Stages	Typically one 13	Multiple (two or more) 13
Adult Feeding Time	Prolonged, several days to weeks 13	Relatively rapid, minutes to hours 13
Female Blood Meals	One large blood meal as adult 13	Multiple small blood meals as adult 13
Egg Laying Events	One large batch of eggs then female dies 13	Multiple smaller batches of eggs after each blood meal 13
Typical Habitat	Exposed environments, vegetation (forests, grasslands) 2	Sheltered environments (burrows, nests, crevices, human dwellings) 2

Data sourced from ²

Hard ticks, such as the deer tick (Ixodes scapularis) and the American dog tick (Dermacentor variabilis), are characterized by the presence of a scutum. This shield can be plain (inornate) or possess distinctive patterns or coloration (ornate), which can aid in species identification.² Soft ticks, in contrast, have a more leathery and flexible body, adapted for their typical habitats in burrows, nests, or crevices.

The capitulum, or mouthparts, is a highly specialized structure essential for host attachment and blood-feeding. It consists of:

• Hypostome: A central, harpoon-like structure armed with rows of backward-pointing barbs or teeth. Once inserted into the host’s skin, these barbs make the hypostome difficult to remove, securely anchoring the tick during its prolonged feeding period.¹ The difficulty in removing the mouthparts intact is a testament to this anchoring efficiency.
• Chelicerae: A pair of cutting appendages located on either side of the hypostome. These function like microscopic scalpels, incising the host’s skin to create an opening for the insertion of the hypostome.²
• Palps: A pair of segmented, sensory appendages that flank the chelicerae and hypostome. The palps do not penetrate the skin but serve sensory functions, helping the tick locate a suitable feeding site. They also act as braces, steadying the capitulum against the host’s skin during attachment.¹ This combination of structures forms a highly sophisticated, multi-functional toolkit, perfectly adapted for stealthy attachment, secure anchoring, and efficient blood-feeding, reflecting millions of years of evolutionary refinement for a parasitic lifestyle.

The main body region of the tick, posterior to the capitulum, is called the idiosoma. It houses the digestive and reproductive organs and, particularly in female hard ticks, is capable of tremendous expansion as the tick engorges on blood.² An unfed female deer tick, for instance, is small and flat, but after a full blood meal, she can swell to the size of a small raisin and take on a grayish color, her body stretched taut with the ingested blood.¹

Distinguishing between different tick species often relies on subtle morphological features. For example, to differentiate between deer ticks (Ixodes scapularis) and American dog ticks (Dermacentor variabilis), one should look for the presence or absence of whitish markings on the scutum. Female deer ticks have a solid black scutum and a reddish-brown abdomen when unfed, while males are uniformly dark brown or black. Both male and female dog ticks, however, possess distinctive white or silvery patterns on their dorsal shield.¹ Size alone is not a reliable indicator for distinguishing these species, as it varies with feeding status and life stage.

B. The Circle of Life: Understanding the Tick Lifecycle

Ticks undergo a complex lifecycle characterized by four distinct stages: egg, larva, nymph, and adult.¹ With the exception of the egg stage, each subsequent active stage—larva, nymph, and adult female (and sometimes male)—must obtain a blood meal to survive, develop, and molt to the next stage or reproduce.¹⁵

The duration of a tick’s lifecycle can vary considerably depending on the species, host availability, and prevailing environmental conditions, often lasting upwards of two to three years.¹⁵ For example, the blacklegged tick (Ixodes scapularis) typically completes its lifecycle in two years, whereas the western blacklegged tick (Ixodes pacificus) may take three years.¹⁵ The challenge of finding a suitable host at each stage is a major factor in tick mortality; many ticks perish before completing their lifecycle.¹⁵

• Egg Stage: Following a successful blood meal and mating, an adult female hard tick detaches from her host and seeks a sheltered environment, such as leaf litter or dense ground cover, to lay her eggs. She can lay thousands of eggs, often appearing as a glistening, brownish-red mass.¹⁶ After oviposition, the female tick typically dies.
• Larval Stage: Tick eggs usually hatch in the summer, giving rise to six-legged larvae, sometimes referred to as “seed ticks.” These larvae are incredibly small, often no bigger than a grain of sand or the period at the end of this sentence.¹ Larval ticks actively seek their first host, which is commonly a small mammal (like the white-footed mouse, a key reservoir for Lyme disease bacteria) or a ground-dwelling bird.¹ If a larva feeds on a host infected with a pathogen, such as Borrelia burgdorferi, it can acquire the infection. This pathogen can then be maintained through the tick’s subsequent molts and life stages, a process known as transstadial transmission.¹⁶ While less common for Lyme disease bacteria, some pathogens can be passed from an infected adult female tick to her eggs (transovarial transmission), meaning larvae can hatch already infectious.¹⁶
• Nymphal Stage: After obtaining a blood meal, the engorged larva drops from its host and molts into an eight-legged nymph. Nymphs are larger than larvae but still very small, often compared to the size of a poppy seed.¹ In temperate regions, nymphs are typically most active during the spring and early summer months (e.g., May and June for Ixodes scapularis).¹ Like larvae, they usually seek small mammalian or avian hosts, but they are also significant biters of humans. Due to their small size and the often painless nature of their bite, nymphs frequently go unnoticed, making them responsible for the majority of human Lyme disease transmissions.¹
• Adult Stage: After feeding, the nymph molts into an adult tick. Adult ticks also require a blood meal. For many three-host tick species, such as Ixodes scapularis, adult ticks typically seek larger mammalian hosts, with white-tailed deer being a common example.⁸ Deer are crucial for the reproductive success of these ticks, providing a large blood meal for adult females and serving as a meeting place for adult males and females to mate. It is important to note that while deer are vital for sustaining tick populations, they do not typically become infected with Lyme disease bacteria themselves and are not considered reservoirs for Borrelia burgdorferi.⁸ Adult female hard ticks feed for an extended period, often about a week, during which they engorge dramatically. Once fully engorged and mated, they detach from the host to lay their eggs, completing the cycle.¹³ Adult male hard ticks feed much less, if at all; their primary purpose on the host is to find and mate with females.¹³

Host specificity varies among tick species. Most hard ticks are three-host ticks, meaning the larva, nymph, and adult stages each feed on a different host animal.¹³ This strategy necessitates dropping off the host and surviving in the environment between each meal, a period fraught with risk. Some species, however, such as the brown dog tick (Rhipicephalus sanguineus), are one-host ticks (or sometimes two-host), preferring to complete all or most of their life stages on the same individual host or hosts of the same species.¹⁵ Ticks demonstrate a broad range of host preferences, capable of feeding on mammals, birds, reptiles, and even amphibians.¹⁵

The lifecycle highlights critical points for disease transmission and intervention. The nymphal stage, due to its small size and abundance during peak human outdoor activity periods, is a key transmission hotspot for diseases like Lyme. Furthermore, the necessity for ticks to find a host at each stage means that failure to do so is a significant source of natural mortality, a vulnerability that can be exploited in control strategies that target host availability or tick survival in the environment.

C. The Blood Meal: Sophisticated Feeding Mechanisms

The process by which a tick obtains a blood meal is a complex and highly orchestrated event, involving specialized anatomical structures and a sophisticated array of secreted molecules.

• Attachment and Lesion Creation: Upon finding a suitable host, the tick selects a bite site, often preferring areas with thinner skin or where it is less likely to be dislodged. Using its sharp chelicerae, it cuts into the host’s skin. The barbed hypostome is then inserted into the wound, anchoring the tick firmly in place.² Some tick species, particularly those that feed for extended periods, secrete a cement-like substance from their salivary glands that hardens around the mouthparts, further securing their attachment to the host.⁶
• Feeding Strategies: Ticks employ one of two primary feeding mechanisms:
  • Pool feeding (Telmophagy): The tick’s mouthparts lacerate the host’s skin and superficial capillaries, creating a small pool of hemorrhaged blood and tissue fluids at the feeding site. The tick then imbibes this mixture.⁴ This destructive feeding style triggers host defense mechanisms like hemostasis, inflammation, and immune responses.¹⁸
  • Piercing and sucking (Solenophagy): More characteristic of some other blood-feeding arthropods like mosquitoes, this involves the tick cannulating its specialized mouthparts directly into a host blood vessel to draw blood. While pool feeding is more common in ticks, elements of direct vessel cannulation can also occur.⁴
• Saliva: The Key to Successful Parasitism: The true marvel of tick feeding lies in its saliva, which is far more than a simple lubricant. During the feeding process, ticks secrete a complex cocktail of pharmacologically active molecules into the feeding lesion.⁴ This salivary brew is essential for overcoming host defenses and ensuring a successful blood meal. Key components include:
  • Anesthetics: These compounds numb the host’s skin at the bite site, ensuring that the initial attachment and feeding often go unnoticed by the host.¹
  • Anticoagulants: These substances prevent the host’s blood from clotting within the feeding lesion and the tick’s mouthparts, ensuring a continuous and uninterrupted flow of blood.¹
  • Anti-inflammatory and Immunomodulatory Compounds: This is perhaps the most sophisticated aspect of tick saliva. It contains a diverse array of molecules that actively suppress the host’s hemostatic responses (platelet aggregation, vasoconstriction), inflammatory reactions, and immune defenses (e.g., complement system activation, white blood cell function).⁴ This local immunosuppression creates a privileged site for the tick to feed and also facilitates pathogen transmission.
  • Extracellular Vesicles (Exosomes): Recent research has revealed that ticks also excrete extracellular vesicles, such as exosomes, in their saliva. These tiny membrane-bound sacs can transport proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids into host cells, further helping to modulate host responses and facilitate feeding.⁴
  • Specific Salivary Protein Families: Numerous families of salivary proteins, such as the Salp family in Ixodes scapularis, play critical roles in modulating various molecular events at the tick-host interface, from inhibiting host enzymes to protecting transmitted pathogens.⁴

The composition of tick saliva is not static. Studies on Ixodes scapularis suggest that ticks may selectively inject functionally similar but antigenically unique proteins into the host every 24 hours during their prolonged feeding period.¹⁸ This ingenious strategy is thought to be a way for the tick to evade the host’s developing immune response. As the host begins to recognize and mount defenses against one set of salivary proteins, the tick switches to secreting a new, immunologically distinct set, effectively staying one step ahead of the host’s adaptive immunity and protecting crucial feeding functions.¹⁸

This complex salivary arsenal is not only vital for the tick’s survival but also makes saliva a prime target for developing anti-tick vaccines. If the host immune system could be pre-sensitized to recognize and rapidly neutralize key salivary components, it could disrupt the tick’s ability to feed, leading to premature detachment or reduced engorgement, and consequently, a reduction in pathogen transmission.

• Pathogen Transmission: The feeding process is inextricably linked to pathogen transmission. Pathogens residing in an infected tick’s salivary glands can be injected into the host along with saliva. Alternatively, pathogens located in the tick’s midgut may replicate and migrate to the salivary glands during feeding, to be transmitted later in the meal. The regurgitation of excess water extracted from the blood meal back into the feeding wound can also facilitate pathogen transfer.⁴ The time required for pathogen transmission varies. For instance, the bacteria causing Lyme disease (Borrelia burgdorferi) typically take 24 to 72 hours of tick attachment to move from the tick’s gut into its saliva and then into the host.⁶ This delay provides a window of opportunity for disease prevention if the tick is removed promptly. However, some viruses, such as Powassan virus, can be transmitted much more rapidly, within minutes of tick attachment ⁶, underscoring the importance of preventing bites in the first place.

D. The Hunt: Questing Strategies and Environmental Cues

Ticks are obligate parasites and must find a host to survive and reproduce. Since they do not fly or jump, they rely on a specialized host-seeking behavior known as questing.⁶

• Questing Behavior: This typically involves the tick ascending blades of grass, stems of shrubs, or other pieces of vegetation. Once in a suitable position, the tick extends its front pair of legs and waits patiently, ready to latch onto any suitable vertebrate host that brushes past.⁶ This is primarily an “ambush” strategy, particularly common in ixodid larvae and many adult hard ticks.¹⁹ Some tick species, however, may employ a more active “hunter” strategy, moving towards detected host cues.¹⁹
• Sensory Organs for Host Detection: Ticks are equipped with an array of sophisticated sensory organs that allow them to detect the presence of potential hosts and orient themselves to favorable environmental conditions.¹⁹ Key among these are:
  • Haller’s Organ: This complex sensory pit is located on the tarsus (the terminal segment) of the first pair of legs. It is highly sensitive to a variety of host-associated cues, including carbon dioxide exhaled by animals, body heat (infrared radiation), humidity gradients, vibrations, and specific chemical signals known as kairomones (e.g., ammonia, lactic acid present in host breath or skin secretions) [¹⁹ (implied by sensory organ mention and host cue detection)].
  • Eyes: Some tick species possess simple eyes (ocelli) on their scutum, which can detect changes in light intensity and shadows, potentially signaling an approaching host or a suitable questing location.¹⁹
  • Palpal Organ and Integumentary Sensilla: The palps contain sensory receptors, and numerous other sensory hairs (sensilla) are distributed over the tick’s body and legs, detecting tactile stimuli, air currents, and chemical cues.¹⁹
• Environmental Cues Influencing Questing: Questing is not a continuous activity; it is heavily influenced by environmental conditions, as ticks must balance the need to find a host with the risk of desiccation and energy expenditure.
  • Temperature: Temperature is a primary factor governing tick activity. Questing generally increases with rising temperatures up to an optimal range for the species. However, if temperatures become too high, leading to excessive water loss, ticks will cease questing and descend into the more humid microclimate of the soil or leaf litter to rehydrate.¹⁹ Interestingly, tick populations from cooler climates may initiate questing at lower ambient temperatures compared to those from warmer regions, suggesting local adaptation.²¹
  • Humidity: Ticks are highly susceptible to desiccation (drying out) and require environments with relatively high humidity to survive, especially during off-host periods.¹⁹ A high vapor pressure deficit (which reflects the “drying power” of the air, a combination of low humidity and high temperature) will force ticks to abandon questing and seek moisture.²¹
  • Light and Photoperiod: The presence of light and the daily photoperiod (length of daylight) can influence the commencement and timing of questing activity, with patterns varying among different tick species.¹⁹
  • Host Proximity Cues: When a potential host is nearby, stimuli such as exhaled carbon dioxide, vibrations from movement, and body heat can intensify the tick’s questing behavior, increasing its readiness to attach.²⁰

Questing represents a calculated risk for the tick. While essential for encountering a host, it exposes the tick to environmental hazards like desiccation, temperature extremes, and predation. Their specialized sensory adaptations and behavioral responses, such as periodically descending from vegetation to rehydrate, are critical for optimizing the trade-off between maximizing host-finding opportunities and ensuring their own survival in the often-harsh off-host environment.

• Questing Height and Clustering: The height at which ticks quest often corresponds to the typical body height of their preferred hosts. Larval ticks, which primarily seek small mammal hosts, tend to quest close to the ground. Nymphs and adults, which may target larger animals, typically quest higher up on vegetation, though generally remaining below waist-level for human encounters.²⁰ Some larval ticks exhibit clustering behavior while questing, which may help reduce individual water loss and increase the collective chance of attaching to a passing host.¹⁹

V. Ticks in the Modern Era: A Pervasive Public and Animal Health Challenge

Ticks are not merely a nuisance; they are significant vectors of diseases affecting both human and animal populations globally. Their impact is shaped by the diversity of tick species, the pathogens they carry, and the ecological contexts in which they thrive. This section examines key tick species, the diseases they transmit, and their public health implications, with a particular focus on Europe and the Netherlands.

A. Rogues’ Gallery: Medically Important Tick Species and Their Global Spread

Numerous tick species are of medical and veterinary importance due to their ability to transmit a wide range of pathogens.⁵ The distribution and prevalence of these species can vary significantly by region, influenced by climate, habitat, and host availability.

Focus on Europe and the Netherlands:

The Netherlands, like much of Europe, hosts several tick species that pose public health risks. Understanding these species is key to targeted prevention and control.

Table 2: Key Medically Important Tick Species in Europe/Netherlands and Diseases Transmitted

Tick Species (Scientific & Common Name)	Primary Geographic Regions (Europe/NL focus)	Key Diseases Transmitted in Region	Typical Hosts (Larva/Nymph, Adult)
Ixodes ricinus (Castor Bean Tick, Sheep Tick)	Widespread across Europe, including NL (dominant species); prefers humid woodlands, heath, forests 5	Lyme borreliosis (Borrelia burgdorferi s.l.), Tick-Borne Encephalitis (TBE), Anaplasmosis, Babesiosis, Rickettsiosis 5	Larvae/Nymphs: Small mammals, birds. Adults: Larger mammals (deer, livestock, humans) 1
Dermacentor reticulatus (Ornate Dog Tick, Meadow Tick)	Europe (Portugal to W. Siberia), including NL & Belgium (spreading); prefers alluvial forests, also drier habitats 22	Canine Babesiosis (Babesia canis), Equine Piroplasmosis (B. caballi, Theileria equi), TBE, Rickettsioses (R. slovaca, R. raoultii) 26	Larvae/Nymphs: Rodents. Adults: Larger mammals (dogs, horses, cattle, deer, humans) 26
Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Brown Dog Tick, Kennel Tick)	Warmer climates globally; Southern Europe (Mediterranean); introduced to NL, can establish indoors 22	Canine Ehrlichiosis (Ehrlichia canis), Canine Babesiosis (B. vogeli, B. canis), Mediterranean Spotted Fever (Rickettsia conorii); rarely Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever to humans 28	Primarily dogs for all stages; occasionally other mammals, humans 15
Ixodes hexagonus (Hedgehog Tick)	Europe, including NL 22	Can transmit Borrelia burgdorferi s.l., Anaplasma phagocytophilum; less primary vector to humans than I. ricinus.	Primarily hedgehogs, also other small to medium-sized mammals (foxes, badgers, dogs, cats) 22

Data sourced from ¹

The spread of ticks like Dermacentor reticulatus into new areas ²⁹ and the introduction of species like Rhipicephalus sanguineus via pet travel ²⁸ illustrate a concerning trend. Global interconnectedness through travel and trade facilitates the expansion of vector and pathogen ranges. This means diseases once considered “exotic” or confined to specific regions can emerge in new areas, turning previously localized threats into broader public and veterinary health concerns and necessitating increased vigilance and surveillance.

B. The Burden of Disease: Common Tick-Borne Illnesses

Ticks transmit a diverse array of pathogens, leading to various illnesses in humans. The following table summarizes key features of some of the most significant tick-borne diseases (TBDs) relevant to Europe and the Netherlands.

Table 3: Overview of Major Tick-Borne Diseases Relevant to Europe/Netherlands

Disease Name	Causative Pathogen	Primary Vector Tick(s) in Europe/NL	Common Symptoms	Typical Incubation Period	General Treatment Approach	Prevention Notes
Lyme Borreliosis (Lyme Disease)	Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (bacteria)	Ixodes ricinus 5	Erythema migrans (expanding rash, not always bull’s-eye), fever, fatigue, headache, muscle/joint pain; later: arthritis, neurological (neuroborreliosis), cardiac issues 7	3-30 days for rash; weeks to months for disseminated symptoms 7	Antibiotics (e.g., doxycycline, amoxicillin) 7	Prompt tick removal (24-72h transmission window 6); no human vaccine currently widely available (VLA15 in trials 37)
Tick-Borne Encephalitis (TBE)	Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus (TBEV – a flavivirus)	Ixodes ricinus 5	Often biphasic: 1st phase (flu-like: fever, fatigue, headache, myalgia); 2nd phase (neurological: meningitis, encephalitis, myelitis). Can have long-term sequelae. Many infections asymptomatic/mild 39	7-14 days (range 2-28 days) for first phase 39	Supportive care only; no specific antiviral treatment 39	Effective vaccines available and recommended for endemic areas 39; rapid transmission (minutes 40)
Anaplasmosis (Human Granulocytic Anaplasmosis)	Anaplasma phagocytophilum (bacteria)	Ixodes ricinus 5	Fever, headache, muscle aches, chills, malaise; less commonly rash 5	5-21 days [General knowledge]	Antibiotics (e.g., doxycycline) [General knowledge]	Prompt tick removal
Babesiosis	Babesia spp. (protozoa, e.g., B. divergens, B. microti)	Ixodes ricinus (for B. divergens, B. microti in Europe) 5	Flu-like symptoms (fever, chills, sweats, fatigue, headache, myalgia), hemolytic anemia, jaundice. Can be severe in elderly or immunocompromised 3	1-4 weeks, or longer [General knowledge]	Anti-protozoal drugs (e.g., atovaquone plus azithromycin) [General knowledge]	Prompt tick removal
Rickettsioses (Spotted Fevers)	Rickettsia spp. (bacteria, e.g., R. conorii, R. helvetica, R. slovaca)	Various, including Rhipicephalus sanguineus (R. conorii), Dermacentor reticulatus (R. raoultii, R. slovaca), Ixodes ricinus (R. helvetica) 5	Fever, headache, rash (often characteristic, e.g., “tache noire” eschar at bite site for some); symptoms vary by Rickettsia species 5	Variable, typically 3-14 days [General knowledge]	Antibiotics (e.g., doxycycline) [General knowledge]	Prompt tick removal

Data sourced from ³

The rapid transmission of viruses like TBEV (within minutes of attachment ⁴⁰) compared to the slower transmission of bacteria like Borrelia burgdorferi (typically requiring 24-72 hours of attachment ⁶) has critical implications for prevention. While prompt tick removal is a cornerstone for Lyme disease prevention, it is less effective against TBE. This underscores the importance of bite prevention measures (repellents, protective clothing) and, where available and recommended, vaccination as primary defenses against TBE. Public health messaging must convey these nuances to ensure individuals adopt the most effective strategies for the range of threats posed by ticks.

C. Spotlight on the Netherlands

The Netherlands provides a well-documented case study of the impact of ticks and TBDs in a Western European nation. Data from public health institutions and research initiatives offer valuable insights into the local situation.

Table 4: Tick-Borne Disease Statistics and Initiatives in the Netherlands

Aspect	Statistic/Finding	Source/Year
Annual Tick Bites	Approx. 1.5 million	RIVM 35
Lyme Disease Incidence (Annual)	Approx. 27,000 cases (erythema migrans or other forms)	RIVM 35
Lyme Disease Long-Term Symptoms (Post-Treatment)	1,000-1,500 people annually	RIVM 35
Borrelia Prevalence in Ticks	Approx. 1 in 5 (20%) Ixodes ricinus ticks carry B. burgdorferi	RIVM 7
Risk of Lyme Disease After Tick Bite	Approx. 2-3% on average	Tekenradar.nl / RIVM 7
TBE Incidence	Rare; 12 patients reported 2016-2020. First autochthonous human case 2016.	RIVM 40
TBEV in Dutch Ticks	Confirmed presence in Ixodes ricinus	RIVM 49
TBE Mandatory Reporting	Implemented March 2023 for cases with neurological symptoms	RIVM 41
Dominant Tick Species	Ixodes ricinus (93.6% in one study)	Sanne van Emden Thesis (UU) 22; also 28
Other Tick Species Present	Ixodes hexagonus (4.7%), Dermacentor reticulatus (1.6%), Rhipicephalus sanguineus (rarely submitted)	Sanne van Emden Thesis (UU) 22; also 28
D. reticulatus Spread	Expanding into novel areas; found on dogs in most provinces; some infected with B. canis, B. caballi	Jongejan et al. 29
R. sanguineus Presence	Introduced, can establish indoors	28
Peak Tick Bite Reporting	June and July (approx. 50% of annual reports)	Tekenradar.nl 46
Highest Tick Bite Risk Area (Relative to Population)	Drenthe, followed by Gelderland	Tekenradar.nl 46
Public Health Initiative: Tekenradar.nl	Citizen science project (Wageningen Uni & RIVM) for tick bite/Lyme reporting and research	RIVM/WUR 46
Public Health Initiative: Tick Awareness Week	Annual campaign for prevention education	RIVM 52
Local Public Health: GGD Hollands Noorden	Provides tick awareness, prevention advice, TBE travel vaccination advice	GGD Hollands Noorden 55

Data sourced from ⁷

The emergence of TBE in the Netherlands, though still at low levels, and the expanding presence of Dermacentor reticulatus highlight the dynamic nature of tick-borne disease landscapes. Public health initiatives like Tekenradar.nl are invaluable in this context. By harnessing citizen science, these programs not only gather vast amounts of epidemiological data—identifying risk areas, seasonality, and even variations in clinical presentations like the erythema migrans rash ⁴⁶—but also directly engage the public, fostering awareness and promoting preventative behaviors.⁵¹ Such platforms act as force multipliers, augmenting traditional public health surveillance and research capacities in a cost-effective manner.

D. Beyond Humans: The Impact on Animal Health (with focus on Netherlands where possible)

Ticks are a major concern for animal health, affecting livestock, companion animals, and wildlife. Several tick-borne diseases in animals are prevalent or emerging in Europe, including the Netherlands.

• Canine Babesiosis:
  • This disease, caused by various Babesia protozoan species (B. canis, B. gibsoni, B. vogeli, B. vulpes), targets and destroys red blood cells in dogs.⁵⁸
  • Transmission primarily occurs through the bite of infected ticks, notably Dermacentor reticulatus and Rhipicephalus sanguineus.⁵⁸ A tick typically needs to be attached and feeding for 2-3 days to transmit Babesia.⁵⁸ For some species like B. gibsoni, direct dog-to-dog transmission via infected blood (e.g., through bite wounds during fights, contaminated blood transfusions, or from an infected mother to her puppies) is also a significant route.⁵⁸
  • Clinical signs can range from subclinical (no apparent illness) to mild (lethargy, reduced appetite) or severe and life-threatening. Severe cases often present with fever, profound weakness due to anemia, pale mucous membranes, jaundice (yellowing of skin and eyes), and dark, reddish-brown urine (hemoglobinuria) due to red blood cell destruction. Kidney failure can also occur, and the disease can be fatal if not treated promptly.²⁸
  • In the Netherlands: Autochthonous (locally acquired) outbreaks of canine babesiosis were first reported in 2004, linked to the presence of Dermacentor reticulatus ticks.²⁸ Studies have confirmed that D. reticulatus ticks in the Netherlands can carry Babesia canis.²⁹ The brown dog tick, Rhipicephalus sanguineus, which is also present (though often introduced via travel and establishing indoors), is another vector for Babesia species.²⁸
  • Treatment involves anti-protozoal drugs like imidocarb dipropionate, atovaquone, or azithromycin, often combined with supportive care such as intravenous fluids and blood transfusions in severe cases.⁵⁹
• Canine Ehrlichiosis:
  • This bacterial disease, primarily caused by Ehrlichia canis, infects the white blood cells of dogs.³¹
  • The main vector is the brown dog tick, Rhipicephalus sanguineus.²⁸ Transmission can occur relatively quickly after the tick starts feeding.⁶³
  • Ehrlichiosis often progresses through three stages:
    1. Acute stage: Occurs 1-3 weeks post-infection, lasting 2-4 weeks. Symptoms include fever, lethargy, loss of appetite, swollen lymph nodes, and sometimes bleeding tendencies (e.g., nosebleeds, petechiae – small bruises on the skin).⁶¹
    2. Subclinical stage: If not cleared, the dog enters this stage with no outward signs of illness. This phase can last for months or even years, during which the dog remains infected.⁶¹
    3. Chronic stage: Some dogs progress to this severe stage, characterized by profound bone marrow suppression leading to very low blood cell counts (pancytopenia). Symptoms include severe weight loss, persistent anemia, bleeding disorders, enlarged spleen, eye inflammation, neurological problems, and susceptibility to secondary infections. This stage can be fatal.⁶¹ German Shepherd Dogs appear to be particularly susceptible to the severe chronic form of the disease.⁶¹
  • In the Netherlands: Rhipicephalus sanguineus is found, often associated with dogs that have travelled to or from endemic areas in Southern Europe, but it can survive and reproduce indoors in heated environments.²⁸ This poses a risk for local transmission if infected ticks are introduced.
  • Treatment typically involves a course of antibiotics, such as doxycycline or tetracycline, for at least 3-4 weeks. Supportive care, including blood transfusions, may be necessary in severe cases.⁶¹

Many animals, including wildlife (such as rodents acting as reservoirs for Borrelia ³⁵ or the white-footed mouse for certain Ehrlichia species ¹⁷) and domestic dogs (which can have subclinical babesiosis or ehrlichiosis ⁵⁸), can carry pathogens without showing obvious signs of illness. These asymptomatic reservoirs play a crucial role in maintaining pathogens in the environment and facilitating their spread via ticks. This complicates control efforts because infection can propagate silently through animal populations, underscoring the need for broad tick control measures and awareness that extends beyond just treating symptomatic individuals, especially in settings like kennels or multi-dog households where transmission risk can be amplified.⁵⁸ Additionally, heavy tick infestations on any animal can lead to anemia simply due to the cumulative blood loss from numerous feeding ticks.²⁸

VI. Charting the Future: Navigating Challenges and Innovations in Tick Management

The relationship between humans, animals, and ticks is not static. It is continually shaped by environmental changes, scientific advancements, and evolving public health strategies. Looking ahead, several key areas will define the future of tick management and the mitigation of tick-borne diseases.

A. A Changing World: Climate Change and Its Influence on Tick Ecology and Disease

Climate change is recognized as a significant global phenomenon with profound and multifaceted ramifications for ecological systems, including the delicate balance that governs tick populations and the diseases they transmit.⁶⁴ Ticks, as ectothermic (cold-blooded) arthropods, spend a substantial portion of their lifecycle off-host, directly exposed to environmental conditions. Consequently, their development, survival, activity patterns, and geographical distribution are highly sensitive to climatic variables, particularly temperature and humidity.⁶⁵

Specific projected and observed effects of climate change on ticks and tick-borne diseases include:

• Geographical Distribution Shifts: Rising global temperatures are widely suggested as a primary driver for alterations in the geographic ranges of many tick species. This can manifest as an expansion of their historical frontiers into new areas, such as higher latitudes where temperatures were previously prohibitive, or to higher altitudes on mountainsides.⁶⁴ While temperature changes are often emphasized, shifts in rainfall patterns and ambient humidity also play a crucial, though perhaps less studied, role in determining whether a tick species can successfully establish and persist in a new region.⁶⁵
• Altered Activity and Seasonality: Climate change can directly influence tick behavior. This includes modifications to the duration of the preoviposition period (time from engorgement to egg-laying), overall survival rates, the length and timing of questing periods (host-seeking), and general host-seeking efficacy. A common consequence is the potential for longer tick activity seasons, with ticks emerging earlier in the spring and remaining active later into the autumn, thereby increasing the window of opportunity for host encounters and pathogen transmission.⁶⁴
• Impacts on Population Dynamics: Warmer temperatures can accelerate tick development, leading to shorter generation times and potentially higher reproductive rates.⁶⁴ For example, empirical studies have shown that increased ambient temperature results in a shorter development period and a higher development rate for various tick species. Conversely, increased humidity can enhance egg hatchability.⁶⁴ Under many climate change scenarios, these factors are projected to contribute to an overall increase in tick abundance in suitable habitats.⁶⁴
• Changes in Tick-Host-Pathogen Relationships: The intricate relationships among ticks, their hosts, and the pathogens they carry are also susceptible to climate-induced disruptions. Climate change can alter the geographical distribution and abundance of key host species, which in turn affects tick populations. Changes in host migratory patterns or population densities can lead to new patterns of tick-host encounters, potentially increasing the risk of zoonotic diseases like Lyme disease and Tick-Borne Encephalitis (TBE) by bringing infected ticks into closer contact with susceptible human or animal populations.⁶⁴

Research institutions, including Wageningen University, are actively investigating these complex interactions. Mathematical modeling is employed to predict how tick populations might respond under various climate change scenarios, integrating data on tick ecology and climate-sensitive life-history parameters.⁶⁴ Field studies examine how factors like forest structure and biodiversity—both of which can be influenced by climate change and land-use policies—affect tick and rodent (key reservoir hosts) populations, and ultimately, disease risk.⁶⁶ For instance, research explores whether increased forest biodiversity leads to a “dilution effect” (reducing disease risk by increasing the proportion of incompetent reservoir hosts or by supporting more predators of competent reservoirs like mice) or an “amplification effect” (increasing risk by supporting a greater abundance or diversity of hosts for ticks).⁶⁶ Understanding these dynamics is critical, especially as policies often aim to enhance forest biodiversity.

It is important to recognize that disentangling the direct effects of climate change from other concurrent environmental and anthropogenic factors—such as changes in host abundance due to habitat fragmentation or altered human recreational habits leading to more exposure—is a significant scientific challenge.⁶⁵ For example, studies involving the experimental exclusion of large wildlife (defaunation) have shown that adult tick abundance can paradoxically increase in such areas. This may be due to unhosted adult ticks engaging in prolonged questing behavior, an effect that was observed to be stronger in more arid sites, potentially mimicking conditions under certain climate change-induced drought scenarios.⁶⁷ Such findings highlight the complexity of predicting net outcomes and emphasize that climate change often acts as a “threat multiplier,” exacerbating existing vulnerabilities and potentially creating new challenges in the realm of tick-borne diseases. This necessitates proactive, adaptive, and well-informed public health strategies that anticipate these evolving risks.

B. Sharpening the Tools: Advances in Diagnostic Technologies for Tick-Borne Diseases

Accurate and timely diagnosis is fundamental to the effective management of tick-borne diseases, enabling prompt treatment and reducing the likelihood of long-term complications. However, current diagnostic methods, particularly for diseases like Lyme disease, face several challenges.

Current Challenges with Serodiagnosis (e.g., for Lyme Disease):

The most widely used diagnostic approach for Lyme disease is a two-tiered serological testing algorithm: an initial screening test, typically an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), followed by a confirmatory Western Blot if the ELISA is positive or equivocal.68 These tests detect the presence of antibodies produced by the host’s immune system in response to infection with Borrelia burgdorferi, rather than detecting the pathogen itself. This indirect approach has inherent limitations:

• Delayed Antibody Response: It can take several weeks for the human immune system to produce a detectable level of antibodies after initial infection. Testing during this “window period” can result in false-negative results, even if the patient is infected and symptomatic.⁶⁸ This delay is particularly problematic for early Lyme disease when treatment is most effective.
• False Positives: Serological tests can sometimes yield false-positive results due to cross-reactivity with antibodies produced in response to other infections (e.g., other spirochetal diseases, certain viral infections, or autoimmune conditions).⁶⁸
• Lack of Standardization and Antigenic Variability: Historically, there have been challenges with the standardization of serological assays. Furthermore, the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato complex encompasses multiple species and strains that exhibit considerable antigenic heterogeneity. A test based on antigens from a single laboratory strain may not efficiently detect antibodies produced against diverse field strains, impacting sensitivity and specificity.⁶⁹

Novel Diagnostic Approaches:

Recognizing these limitations, significant research efforts are underway to develop improved diagnostic tools for tick-borne diseases, aiming for greater accuracy, earlier detection, and ease of use. This “diagnostic arms race” is critical for moving beyond the constraints of traditional antibody-based methods.

• Direct Pathogen Detection Methods: These approaches aim to detect the pathogen itself or its components, rather than relying on the host’s immune response.
  • DualDur Test (Lyme Diagnostics Ltd.): This proprietary method is based on morphological detection. It involves a process to concentrate spirochetes from a 4 ml blood sample, allowing for their direct visualization using dark-field microscopy while they are still alive and motile. The company claims this method is not dependent on the host’s immune reaction and is therefore useful in early-stage disease. They report a sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 89%, and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 96%, based on extensive European clinical testing.⁷⁰
• Improved Serological and Immunological Tests:
  • iDart Lyme IgG ImmunoBlot Kit (ID-Fish Technology): Cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in September 2024, this is a stand-alone immunoblot test for detecting Lyme-specific Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies. It incorporates 31 different Lyme antigen bands—more than many other commercially available tests—with the aim of improving the sensitivity of diagnosis in suspected patients without compromising specificity.⁷¹
  • Cytokine-Based Immunoassays: Research is exploring the detection of specific cytokines (immune signaling molecules) or patterns of cytokine expression that are induced early in infection, potentially before a robust antibody response is mounted. This could allow for earlier and more rapid diagnosis.⁶⁸
  • Lateral Flow Technologies: Efforts are focused on developing rapid, point-of-care diagnostic tests using lateral flow technology (similar to home pregnancy tests). Such tests could provide quick results in clinical settings or even for field use.⁶⁸
  • Metabolic Biomarkers and Biosignatures: Scientists are working to identify and characterize unique metabolic biomarkers or “biosignatures” (patterns of metabolites) in patient samples that are indicative of active Lyme disease infection. These could lead to new methods for earlier detection, accurate staging of the disease, or even monitoring treatment efficacy.⁶⁸
  • Next-Generation T-Cell Based Assays and Novel Antigens: Research is also investigating the utility of T-cell activation markers and the use of novel, more specific Borrelial antigens in serological assays to improve the accuracy of diagnosis and the assessment of treatment outcomes.⁶⁸
• In Vivo Induced Antigen Technology (IVIAT): This technology, often combined with multi-peptide ELISA platforms, aims to identify antigens that are specifically expressed by Borrelia in vivo (i.e., during actual infection in a host), rather than just those expressed during laboratory culture. The rationale is that these in vivo-expressed antigens are more likely to be relevant targets for the host immune response and could lead to more sensitive and specific diagnostic tests that better account for the pathogen’s antigenic variability during infection.⁶⁹

The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the U.S. are actively supporting research into these and other novel diagnostic approaches. Priorities include developing tests that can distinguish between active and past infections, accurately diagnose co-infections with other tick-borne pathogens (which can complicate the clinical picture of Lyme disease), and provide more reliable early-stage diagnosis.⁶⁸ The pursuit of faster, more definitive diagnostics is essential for enabling prompt and appropriate treatment, thereby mitigating the risk of chronic or persistent symptoms associated with diseases like Lyme.

C. The Shield of Science: The Development of Anti-Lyme and Anti-Tick Vaccines

Vaccination represents one of the most promising avenues for preventing tick-borne diseases. Efforts are underway on multiple fronts, focusing both on pathogen-specific vaccines (like those for Lyme disease and TBE) and on the more ambitious concept of anti-tick vaccines.

• Anti-Lyme Disease Vaccines (targeting Borrelia burgdorferi):
  • VLA15 (Valneva/Pfizer): As of mid-2025, VLA15 is the only Lyme disease vaccine candidate in advanced (Phase 3) clinical development.³⁷
    • Mechanism: It is a multivalent protein subunit vaccine that targets Outer surface protein A (OspA), a protein expressed by Borrelia spirochetes when they are in the tick midgut. The vaccine is designed to elicit antibodies in the human recipient. When a tick carrying Borrelia feeds on a vaccinated individual, it ingests these antibodies along with the blood. The antibodies then target OspA on the spirochetes within the tick’s gut, neutralizing them before they can be transmitted to the human host. VLA15 is designed to protect against six different OspA serotypes, covering the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato species most commonly causing Lyme disease in North America (e.g., B. burgdorferi sensu stricto) and Europe (e.g., B. afzelii, B. garinii, B. bavariensis).³⁷
    • Clinical Development: The Phase 3 VALOR study is ongoing, with the primary vaccination series (three doses administered at Months 0, 2, and 6) completed. Initial data from this pivotal Phase 3 trial are anticipated by the end of 2025.³⁷ Phase 2 studies have demonstrated strong immunogenicity (antibody responses) after booster doses in both adult and pediatric populations, along with a favorable safety profile.³⁷
    • Regulatory Pathway: Valneva and Pfizer are collaborating on the development and commercialization of VLA15. Subject to positive Phase 3 data, they aim to submit a Biologics License Application (BLA) to the U.S. FDA and a Marketing Authorization Application (MAA) to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2026.³⁷ The VLA15 program received Fast Track designation from the FDA in July 2017, underscoring the recognized need for such a vaccine.³⁷
• Anti-Tick Vaccines (A Broader Protection Concept): Beyond pathogen-specific approaches, a highly innovative area of research is the development of anti-tick vaccines. The goal here is not to target a specific bacterium or virus, but rather to target the tick vector itself.³⁸
  • Mechanism: These experimental vaccines typically aim to induce an immune response in the host against components of tick saliva or other critical tick proteins involved in feeding or survival. The concept is that if a host is vaccinated against these tick molecules, their immune system will mount a rapid response upon being bitten by a tick. This could manifest as an enhanced local inflammation at the bite site, similar to what is seen in individuals who have developed “acquired tick resistance” (ATR) through repeated natural exposure to tick bites. Such a reaction could cause the tick to detach prematurely, feed poorly, or die before it has a chance to transmit any pathogens it might be carrying.³⁸
  • Potential Advantages: A successful anti-tick vaccine could theoretically offer broad protection against multiple tick-borne diseases simultaneously, as it would interfere with the common vector. This is a significant advantage given the diverse array of pathogens transmitted by ticks.³⁸ While still in earlier stages of research compared to VLA15, the pursuit of an anti-tick vaccine represents a potential “holy grail” in TBD prevention, offering a more universal shield.
• Vaccines for Other Tick-Borne Diseases:
  • Tick-Borne Encephalitis (TBE) Vaccine: Highly effective vaccines against TBE virus (e.g., FSME-IMMUN®, Encepur®) have been available for decades and are commonly used in many TBE-endemic areas of Europe and Asia.³⁹ These vaccines have demonstrated excellent efficacy, often exceeding 95-99% protection with appropriate dosing schedules, and are credited with preventing thousands of TBE cases annually in Europe.⁴³ Vaccination policies and uptake vary across European countries; it is a standard part of national immunization programs in some highly endemic nations but may only be recommended for specific risk groups or travelers in others.⁴²

The progress in vaccine development, particularly for Lyme disease, offers substantial hope for reducing the burden of these debilitating illnesses. The parallel exploration of anti-tick vaccines, while more challenging, holds the promise of an even broader impact on public and veterinary health.

D. An Integrated Front: The One Health Approach to Surveillance and Control

The complex nature of tick-borne diseases, which inherently involve interactions among humans, animals (both wild and domestic), and their shared environments, necessitates a holistic and collaborative strategy for effective surveillance and control. The One Health approach provides such a framework.

• Definition and Principles: One Health is an integrated, unifying concept that recognizes the fundamental interconnectedness of the health of people, animals (including wildlife and domestic species), plants, and the wider environment.¹⁷ It emphasizes that the health of each of these domains is inextricably linked and that optimal health outcomes can only be achieved through collaborative, multisectoral, and transdisciplinary efforts. This approach operates at all levels—local, regional, national, and global—and involves communication and cooperation among professionals from diverse fields such as human medicine, veterinary medicine, environmental science, ecology, public health, and social sciences.⁷²
• Application to Tick-Borne Diseases: Tick-borne diseases are quintessential One Health issues. Their emergence, spread, and persistence are driven by a complex interplay of factors:
  • Vectors: Tick populations and their distribution.
  • Reservoir Hosts: Wildlife species (e.g., rodents, birds, deer) that maintain and amplify pathogens without necessarily showing signs of illness.
  • Incidental Hosts: Humans and domestic animals that can become infected.
  • Environmental Factors: Climate change, land use patterns (deforestation, reforestation, urbanization encroaching on natural habitats), biodiversity, and habitat characteristics that influence tick and host populations.¹⁷
  A One Health approach applied to TBDs aims to:
  • Enhance Surveillance: This involves not just tracking human cases, but also systematically monitoring tick populations (species, density, infection rates), pathogen prevalence in reservoir hosts (wildlife, pets), and environmental conditions conducive to tick proliferation. For example, data on canine seroprevalence for Lyme disease can serve as a valuable sentinel indicator of human risk in a given area.⁷² Integrating data streams from human health, animal health, and environmental sectors is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of TBD dynamics.⁷²
  • Improve Control Strategies: Interventions should be multifaceted, addressing human protection (awareness, repellents, prompt tick removal), animal health (tick prevention on pets and livestock), and environmental management (habitat modification to reduce tick abundance in high-risk areas). Wildlife management considerations may also play a role, although this is often complex.¹⁷
  • Foster Collaborative Research: Understanding the drivers of TBD transmission and developing effective interventions requires collaborative research spanning disciplines such as ecology, epidemiology, veterinary medicine, human medicine, climatology, and molecular biology.⁷³
  • Inform Policy and Public Education: A One Health perspective can lead to more effective public health policies and educational campaigns that address the interconnected risks.

The increasing complexity of TBD emergence and spread, fueled by factors like climate change, alterations in land use, and the global movement of animals and people, renders siloed, single-discipline approaches insufficient. The interconnectedness of human, animal, and environmental health in the context of TBDs makes the adoption of a One Health framework not merely beneficial, but essential for developing sustainable and effective long-term solutions. Initiatives that link changes in land cover and wildlife diversity to the spread of TBDs underscore this interconnectedness.¹⁷ This holistic perspective is vital for preventing the expansion of TBDs into new areas, identifying and protecting at-risk communities, and ultimately safeguarding both human and animal health from these persistent and often emerging threats.⁷²

VII. Staying Safe: Effective Prevention and Control Strategies

Given the significant health risks posed by ticks, preventing tick bites is the first and most crucial line of defense. Effective prevention involves a combination of personal protective measures, environmental management, and public awareness.

Table 5: Tick Prevention and Control Measures

Category	Specific Measure	Description & Key Advice
Personal Protection	Awareness & Avoidance	Know tick habitats (woods, tall grass, leaf litter) & peak seasons (warmer months, but activity possible year-round if >5-10°C). Stay on trails. Check Tekenradar.nl (NL) for activity levels. 6
	Protective Clothing	Wear long sleeves, long pants tucked into socks. Light colors help spot ticks. 6
	Tick Repellents	Use EPA-registered repellents (DEET, picaridin, oil of lemon eucalyptus) on skin. Treat clothing/gear with 0.5% permethrin. Follow label instructions. 6
	Tick Checks	Thoroughly check body, children, pets after outdoor activities. Key areas: scalp, ears, armpits, belly button, waist, groin, behind knees, hair. Shower within 2 hours. Check/dry clothes on high heat. 6
	Prompt Tick Removal	Remove attached ticks ASAP. Use fine-tipped tweezers, grasp close to skin, pull upward steadily. Don’t twist/crush. Clean bite area & hands post-removal. Avoid folk remedies. Note date/location of bite. 6
Environmental Management (Yard/Property)	Reduce Tick Habitat	Remove leaf litter, brush, tall grass. Mow lawn regularly. Create wood chip/gravel barriers between lawn & woods. Avoid/remove invasive plants that harbor ticks (e.g., Japanese barberry). 20
	Increase Sunlight	Prune lower tree branches, thin shrubs to dry out areas. 75
	Reduce Rodent Harborage	Keep woodpiles/stone walls neat & away from house/play areas. Use bird feeders only in fall/winter. Consider deer fencing. 20
Public Awareness & Education	Consistent Messaging	Public health agencies, medical professionals, media provide unified advice. 76
	Awareness Campaigns	E.g., “Tick Awareness Week” (NL, UK) for education on prevention, ID, removal, seeking medical help. 52
	Information Resources	Utilize platforms like Tekenradar.nl (NL) for info & reporting. 51
	Professional Education	Ensure medical professionals maintain high index of suspicion for TBDs. 76

Data sourced from ⁶

No single prevention method is entirely foolproof. The most effective protection against tick bites and the diseases they carry relies on a multi-layered strategy. This involves consistently applying personal protective behaviors—such as being aware of risky environments, wearing appropriate clothing, using repellents, performing diligent tick checks, and ensuring prompt and correct tick removal—alongside proactive environmental management to reduce tick habitats in frequently used areas.

Despite widespread public health advice, consistent and thorough adherence to measures like tick checks can be challenging. Human behavior is complex, and factors such as forgetfulness, the perceived inconvenience, or an underestimation of personal risk can lead to lapses in diligence. The detailed guidance provided by health authorities on where to check (scalp, ears, armpits, groin, behind knees, etc. ⁶) and when (after any outdoor activity, ideally coupled with showering ¹⁷) underscores the thoroughness required. However, it also highlights the significant demand placed on individual vigilance. The finding from Tekenradar.nl that nearly one in five people who reported a tick bite discovered more than one tick simultaneously ⁴⁶ suggests that initial checks may not always be immediate or fully comprehensive. Therefore, public health campaigns must not only inform but also find innovative ways to motivate individuals and help integrate these crucial checks into daily routines to improve compliance and reduce the burden of tick-borne illnesses.

While personal protection measures are largely individual responsibilities, environmental management strategies offer a more passive, community-level defense. Modifying yards and public spaces by removing leaf litter, keeping grass mown, creating barriers between lawns and wooded areas, and avoiding the planting of tick-harboring invasive species can significantly reduce tick habitat and, consequently, tick populations in areas of high human activity.⁷⁵ These actions lower the baseline tick pressure in the human environment, benefiting everyone who uses those spaces, including those who may be less meticulous with personal protective measures. This creates a safer environment overall and complements individual efforts to prevent tick encounters.

VIII. Conclusion: Living with Ticks – An Ongoing Journey

A. Recapitulation of Key Insights

Ticks are ancient arthropods, whose evolutionary success over millions of years is a testament to their remarkable adaptability as obligate blood-feeding parasites.⁸ Their journey through deep time has seen them co-evolve intricate relationships with a vast array of vertebrate hosts and a multitude of pathogens. This report has charted their origins, explored their complex biology and sophisticated feeding mechanisms, and documented their historical and contemporary impact on both human and animal health. We have seen how scientific understanding has progressed from early, tentative observations of tick-associated illnesses to the identification of specific pathogens and the elucidation of complex transmission cycles.⁸ The development of tools for diagnosis, prevention, and control continues to advance, offering new hope in mitigating the threats posed by these vectors.

B. The Unfolding Narrative: Future Outlook and Persistent Challenges

The story of ticks and the diseases they transmit is far from over; it is an unfolding narrative shaped by dynamic interactions and persistent challenges. Factors such as climate change are demonstrably altering tick distribution and activity patterns, potentially expanding their geographic ranges and lengthening their active seasons, thereby increasing the risk of exposure in previously unaffected or less affected areas.⁶⁴ The emergence of novel pathogens and the re-emergence of known ones remain constant possibilities, demanding robust and adaptive surveillance systems.

In this context, the critical need for continued, well-funded research into all aspects of tick biology, ecology, and disease transmission cannot be overstated. Surveillance efforts, particularly those embracing the comprehensive One Health approach—integrating human, animal, and environmental health data—are paramount for early detection of changing risks and emerging threats.⁷² Citizen science initiatives, such as Tekenradar.nl in the Netherlands, have proven to be invaluable partners in these efforts, significantly augmenting data collection and public engagement.⁴⁶ Public health vigilance, coupled with sustained public awareness campaigns that empower individuals with the knowledge to protect themselves, remains a cornerstone of defense.

C. A Call for Continued Engagement

The pervasive presence of ticks and the diseases they carry underscore a complex and enduring relationship among humans, domestic animals, wildlife, and the shared environment. Managing these threats is not a one-time fix but an ongoing journey that requires continuous adaptation, scientific innovation, and broad collaboration across disciplines and societal sectors. As tick populations and pathogen landscapes evolve, often in response to anthropogenic changes to the environment, our strategies for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment must also evolve. The “new normal” may well involve a heightened and more ingrained state of “tick awareness” becoming an integral part of how we interact with the natural world, rather than a seasonal or niche concern. The race between the natural adaptability of these ancient parasites and the ingenuity of human scientific endeavor will continue to define our efforts to coexist with and control the impact of ticks on global health.

IX. Information Sources

• Academic OUP – Mapping the risk of tick-borne encephalitis in Europe for informed vaccination decisions ⁴²
• (https://www.cdc.gov/ticks/about/tick-lifecycles.html) ¹⁵
• (https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/data-research/facts-stats/lyme-disease-case-map.html) ⁷⁸
• (https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/data-research/facts-stats/index.html) ⁷⁹
• (https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/data-research/facts-stats/surveillance-data-1.html) ⁸⁰
• (https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/lyme-disease/fda-clears-new-lyme-disease-test) ⁷¹
• (https://en.dierenkliniekdewetering.nl/ticks) ²⁸
• (https://dierenkliniekrivierenbuurt.com/information/dog-from-abroad/) ³⁴
• (https://www.eatg.org/hiv-news/ecdc-annual-epidemiological-reports-2023-hepatitis-b-and-c/) ⁸¹
• (https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/borreliosis-lyme-disease) ³⁶
• (https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/ixodes-ricinus-current-known-distribution-february-2023) ²⁵
• (https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/tick-borne-encephalistis-annual-epidemiological-report-2022_0.pdf) ³⁹
• (https://extension.entm.purdue.edu/publichealth/print/insects/tick.html) ¹³
• (https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cellular-and-infection-microbiology/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2021.816547/full) ⁴
• (https://www.gbif.org/species/2183597) ³³
• (https://www.ggdhollandsnoorden.nl/actueel/) ⁵⁵
• (https://www.ggdkennemerland.nl/en/mijn-gezondheid/infectieziekten/informatie-verschillende-infectieziekten/tekenencefalitis-tbe) ⁴⁰
• (https://ggdleefomgeving.nl/ongedierte-en-schadelijke-planten/teken/) ⁵⁶
• (https://www.ggdreisvaccinaties.nl/locaties/ggd-hollands-noorden-den-helder) ⁷⁷
• (https://content.govdelivery.com/attachments/topic_files/UKDEVONCC/UKDEVONCC_1487/2025/03/20/file_attachments/3202911/Ticks%20and%20Lyme%20toolkit%202025%20All%20Devon%20Cornwall%20IOS%20Somerset%20issued%2020.03.25__3202911.pdf) ⁷⁶
• (https://holistischdierenarts.nl/en/ticks-and-lyme-disease-in-dogs-and-cats/) ⁵⁰
• (https://www.insectshield.com/blogs/blog/the-discovery-of-lyme-disease-how-it-was-identified-studied) ⁹
• (https://www.insectshield.com/blogs/blog/ticks-in-history-their-evolution-impact) ⁸
• (https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article/figures?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1005488) ¹² (Note: Original link was to plospathogens, assuming content is similar or accessible via this structure if original was problematic)
• (https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012903) ⁶⁴
• (https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0004323) ¹⁸
• (https://knowledgeconnection.mainehealth.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1206&context=jmmc) ⁷²
• (https://lymediagnostics.com/) ⁷⁰
• (https://www.maine.gov/dhhs/mecdc/infectious-disease/epi/vector-borne/lyme/documents/ticked.pdf) ¹
• (https://www.maine.gov/dhhs/mecdc/infectious-disease/epi/vector-borne/lyme/tick-prevention-and-property-management.shtml) ⁷⁵
• (https://med.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Veterinary_Medicine/Clinical_Veterinary_Diagnostic_Laboratory_(Burton_and_Lalande)/10%3A_Veterinary_Ectoparasites/10.02%3A_General_anatomy_of_ticks) ²
• (https://www.niaid.nih.gov/diseases-conditions/lyme-disease-diagnostics-research) ⁶⁸
• (https://www.nidirect.gov.uk/news/protect-yourself-against-tick-bites) ⁷⁴
• Northeastern University News – Lyme vaccine, anti-tick research ³⁸
• (https://www.nps.gov/articles/one-health-disease-ticks-borne.htm) ¹⁷
• (https://vet.osu.edu/sites/default/files/documents/AKC_CHF_Canine_Babesiosis_Fact_Sheet_20231115.pdf) ⁵⁸
• (https://www.parkview.com/blog/a-ticks-quest) ⁶
• (https://www.pa.gov/agencies/dep/programs-and-services/integration/vector-management/ticks.html) ²⁰
• (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3790545/) ³
• (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4998423/) ⁴⁹
• (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2722197/) ⁶⁹
• (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10092223/) ⁸²
• (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6903726/) ⁵⁴
• (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7677832/) ¹⁹
• (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12017008/) ²⁷
• (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3313475/) ⁶⁵
• (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4198204/) ²¹
• (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7471206/) ²⁶
• (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25889392/) ²⁹ (Note: This is a PubMed link, often leading to PMC or publisher site)
• (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15923085/) ⁶⁰ (Note: This is a PubMed link)
• PubMed Central – A systematic literature review of the effectiveness of tick-borne encephalitis vaccines in Europe ⁴³ (Note: This is a PubMed link)
• (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8992474_The_Fossil_Record_and_the_Origin_of_Ticks_Acari_Parasitiformes_Ixodida) ¹⁰
• (https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Map-of-the-Netherlands-and-Belgium-showing-all-sites-where-Dermacentor-reticulatus-ticks_fig1_275101618) ³⁰
• (https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Ticks-in-Europe-Distribution-of-six-medically-and-veterinary-important-tick-species-in_fig1_339888462) ⁵
• (https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-current-2022-distribution-of-Ixodes-ricinus-and-Ixodes-persulcatus-showing-the_fig1_366598049) ²⁴
• (https://www.rivm.nl/en/news/duty-to-report-now-applies-for-tick-borne-encephalitis) ⁴¹
• (https://www.rivm.nl/en/news/expected-peak-in-tick-bite-season) ⁴⁴
• (https://www.rivm.nl/en/tick-bites/faq) ⁷
• (https://www.rivm.nl/en/lyme-disease) ³⁵
• (https://www.rivm.nl/en/lyme-disease/news) ⁵⁷
• (https://www.rivm.nl/en/news/new-lyme-disease-study-in-netherlands) ⁵²
• (https://www.rivm.nl/en/tick-bites/reporting-tick-bite) ⁵³
• (https://www.rivm.nl/en/news/ten-years-of-tick-radar-80000-tick-bite-reports-chances-of-being-bitten-highest-in-drenthe) ⁴⁶
• (https://www.rivm.nl/en/tick-borne-encephalitis) ⁴⁷
• (https://rovince.co.uk/blogs/blog/rhipicephalus-sanguineus-dog-tick) ³²
• (https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2018.0037) ⁶⁷
• (https://www.sph.umn.edu/event/one-health-approach-to-characterizing-tick-borne-disease-risks-among-outdoor-workers/) ⁷³
• (https://stray-afp.org/ehrlichiosis-in-dogs) ⁶²
• (https://studenttheses.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/20.500.12932/37220/masterthesisSannevanEmdenpdf.pdf?sequence=1) ²²
• (https://web.uri.edu/tickencounter/fieldguide/id-guide/) ¹⁴
• (https://www.ticklab.org/blog/2020/12/01/the-tick-lifecycle/) ¹⁶
• (https://ticksafety.com/tick-identification/brown-dog-tick/) ³¹
• (https://www.travax.nhs.uk/news/news-record-page?newsid=21746) ⁴⁸
• (https://www.vax-before-travel.com/vaccines/lyme-disease-vaccine-vla15) ³⁷
• (https://www.vetspecialists.co.uk/fact-sheets-post/ehrlichiosis-fact-sheet/) ⁶³
• (https://www.vlaggraduateschool.nl/en/showpages/show/tekenradar.nl-tick-radar.htm) ⁵¹
• Wikipedia – Ehrlichiosis (canine) ⁶¹
• Wikipedia – Ixodes ricinus ²³
• (https://www.wur.nl/en/newsarticle/how-lyme-ticks-mice-and-forests-are-interrelated.htm) ⁶⁶
• ZonMw – Lyme disease ⁴⁵