Ancient astronauts

Petroglyphs from Val Camonica, Italy. Ancient astronaut proponents believe that these pictures resemble modern astronauts.
Petroglyphs from Val Camonica, Italy. Ancient astronaut proponents believe that these pictures resemble modern astronauts.

Ancient astronauts (or ancient aliens) refer to a pseudoscientific set of beliefs[1][2][3][4] that hold that intelligent extraterrestrial beings visited Earth and made contact with humans in antiquity and prehistoric times.[1][2][4] Proponents suggest that this contact influenced the development of modern cultures, technologies, religions, and human biology.[1][2] A common position is that deities from most, if not all, religions are extraterrestrial in origin, and that advanced technologies brought to Earth by ancient astronauts were interpreted as evidence of divine status by early humans.[1][2][5]

The idea that ancient astronauts existed and visited Earth is not taken seriously by academics and archaeologists, who identify such claims as pseudoarchaeological[6] and/or unscientific.[7] It has received no credible attention in peer reviewed studies.[8] When proponents of the idea present evidence in favor of their beliefs, it is often distorted or fabricated.[9] Further, the history of thought surrounding the subject shows that proponents have adopted white supremacist beliefs to argue that indigenous cultures around the world were incapable of the feats of technology and culture that they achieved.[1][10][11]

Well-known proponents of these beliefs in the latter half of the 20th century who have written numerous books or appear regularly in mass media include Robert CharrouxJacques BergierJean SendyErich von Däniken,[1][2][4] Alexander KazantsevZecharia SitchinRobert K. G. TempleGiorgio A. TsoukalosDavid Hatcher ChildressPeter Kolosimo, and Mauro Biglino.

Overview

Mesopotamian cylinder seal.

Various terms are used to reference claims about ancient astronauts, such as ancient aliens,[12] ancient ufonauts,[13] ancient space pilots,[14] paleocontact,[15] astronaut- or alien gods,[16][17] or paleo- or Biblical-SETI (search for extraterrestrial intelligence).[18][19]

Believers in such ancient astronaut stories often maintain that all or some humans are either descendants or creations of extraterrestrial intelligence who landed on Earth at some point in the ancient past. An associated idea is that human knowledge, religion, and culture came from extraterrestrial visitors in ancient times, in that ancient astronauts acted as a “mother culture“. Additionally, proponents often claim that travelers from outer space built many of the structures on Earth (such as Egyptian pyramids and the Moai stone heads of Easter Island) or aided humans in building them.[20] Proponents contend that the evidence for ancient astronauts comes from documentary gaps in historical and archaeological records while citing archaeological artifacts that they believe, contrary to the mainstream explanations, are anachronistic and supposedly beyond the technical capabilities of the people who made them. These are sometimes referred to as “out-of-place artifacts“; and include artwork and legends which believers reinterpret to fit stories of extraterrestrial contact or technologies.[21]

As a pseudoarcheology, the idea receives notice in fringe pulp media, such as the History Channel series Ancient Aliens.[22] Such shows use a strategy known as ‘fire-hosing’ to co-mingle fact with fiction in order to spread theories of an alternate past with tropes that follow white supremacistnativistimperialistsettler-colonial, and Christian Identity beliefs relevant to the past.[23] The celebrity proponents of ancient aliens profess to be a part of an oppressed minority of academics that ‘big archaeology’ is conspiring to disenfranchise while their identity of being a maverick or a rogue aligns with the individuals’ lack of credentials.[24]

Like archaeological endeavors of the criticized past, these proponents focus primarily on monumental archaeological structures claiming they could have only been constructed with extraterrestrial intervention. The implication is that the non-white Indigenous people in the regions in which these monuments appear could not have built them on their own.[25] However, Dakota/Lakota Sioux writer Ruth H. Burns, in Atmos magazine, counters that ancient alien theory and the idea of extraterrestrials in general supports the viewpoints of indigenous, non-European peoples. The denial of extraterrestrial encounters and indigenous peoples’ stories tracing their origins to extraterrestrials is part of “Indigenous erasure,” as it minimizes or completely discounts the viewpoints of indigenous peoples. Many indigenous peoples trace their ancestry to “star-people” or the like—extraterrestrials who as the progenitors of indigenous peoples cannot by definition be white or “Aryan.” [26]

A common feature in the stories portray the aliens as light-skinned or Aryan in complexion, as prominent alien astronaut proponent Erich von Däniken claims in his foundational work Chariots of the Gods?[10][11] Some ancient astronaut proponents are thus associated with white supremacism, although their theories are sometimes applied to European cultures as well.[27][28]

These claims are so outlandish that up until recently, mainstream archaeologists essentially ignored them as absurdities.[23] The few dedicated popular science explainers and skeptics who did offer opinions on the ideas universally panned them. For example, Carl Sagan wrote, “In the long litany of ‘ancient astronaut’ pop archaeology, the cases of apparent interest have perfectly reasonable alternative explanations, or have been misreported, or are simple prevarications, hoaxes and distortions”.[29]

History of ancient aliens beliefs and their proponents

Paleocontact or “ancient astronaut” narratives first appeared in the early science fiction of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, including the 1898 novel Edison’s Conquest of Mars[30] and the works of H.P. Lovecraft.[31] The idea was proposed in earnest by journalist Harold T. Wilkins in 1954. It grew in popularity in the 1960s, mainly due to the Space Race and the success of Erich von Däniken’s works, although it also received limited consideration as a serious hypothesis. Critics emerged throughout the 1970s, discrediting Von Däniken’s claims. Ufologists separated the idea from the UFO controversy. By the early 1980s little remaining support could be found.[32]

Shklovskii and Sagan

Dogū figurine made during Jōmon period (dated 1000–400 BCE).
Votive relief of the winged priest of Dudu on display at the Louvre Museum, France

Carl Sagan co-authored a widely popular book Intelligent Life in the Universe, with Soviet astrophysicist Iosif Shklovsky and published in 1966.[33] In his 1979 book Broca’s Brain, Sagan suggested that he and Shklovsky might have inspired the wave of 1970s ancient astronaut books, expressing disapproval of “von Däniken and other uncritical writers” who seemingly built on these ideas not as guarded speculations but as “valid evidence of extraterrestrial contact.”[34] Sagan pointed out that while many legends, artifacts, and purported out-of-place artifacts were cited in support of ancient astronaut hypotheses, “very few require more than passing mention” and could be easily explained with more conventional hypotheses. Sagan also reiterated his earlier conclusion that extraterrestrial visits to Earth were possible but unproven and improbable.[35]

Erich von Däniken

The sarcophagus lid of Pacal the Great.

Erich von Däniken was a leading proponent of this hypothesis in the late 1960s and early 1970s, gaining a large audience through the 1968 publication of his best-selling book Chariots of the Gods? and its sequels.

According to von Däniken, certain artifacts require a more sophisticated technological ability in their construction than that which was available to the ancient cultures who constructed them. Von Däniken maintains that these artifacts were constructed either directly by extraterrestrial visitors or by humans who learned the necessary knowledge from said visitors. These include StonehengePumapunku, the Moai of Easter Island, the Great Pyramid of Giza, and the ancient Baghdad electric batteries.

The so-called “Helicopter hieroglyphs“, at Abydos, Egypt.

Von Däniken writes that ancient art and iconography throughout the world illustrates air and space vehicles, non-human but intelligent creatures, ancient astronauts, and artifacts of an anachronistically advanced technology. Von Däniken also states that geographically separated historical cultures share artistic themes, which he argues imply a common origin. One such example is von Däniken’s interpretation of the sarcophagus lid recovered from the tomb of the Classic-era Maya ruler of PalenquePacal the Great. Von Däniken writes that the design represented a seated astronaut. The iconography and accompanying Maya text, however, identifies it as a portrait of the ruler himself with the World Tree of Maya mythology.

The origins of many religions are interpreted by von Däniken as reactions to encounters with an alien race. According to his view, humans considered the technology of the aliens to be supernatural and the aliens themselves to be gods. Von Däniken states that the oral and written traditions of most religions contain references to alien visitors in the way of descriptions of stars and vehicular objects traveling through air and space. One such is Ezekiel‘s revelation, which Däniken interprets as a detailed description of a landing spacecraft (The Spaceships of Ezekiel).

Von Däniken’s hypotheses became popularized in the U.S. after the NBC-TV documentary In Search of Ancient Astronauts hosted by Rod Serling, and the film Chariots of the Gods.

Critics argue that von Däniken misrepresented data, that many of his claims were unfounded, and that none of his core claims have been validated.[36] In particular the Christian creationist community is highly critical of most of von Däniken’s work. Young Earth creationist author Clifford A. Wilson published Crash Go the Chariots in 1972 in which he attempted to discredit all the claims made in Chariots of the Gods.[37]

In Chariots of the Gods?, regarding the Nazca Lines, von Däniken states that “Seen from the air, the clear-cut impression that the 60 km [37-mile] long plain of Nazca made on me was that of an airfield.”[38] Considering he was in the process of seeking evidence of ancient aliens, von Däniken exhibits confirmation bias, as he does not consider the Nazca Lines to be man-made until after the publication of Chariots of the Gods? This etic perspective that he presents could be easily accepted by a reader familiar with air travel, and an undeveloped knowledge of the nature of the geoglyphs. Furthermore, since the majority of readers of Chariots of the Gods? are not educated in viewing artifacts from ancient civilizations, their interpretations are highly subject to von Däniken’s opinions of the artifacts. Kenneth L. Feder argues a reader seeing the Nazca Lines for the first time in a book about aliens would be much more likely to associate those features with extraterrestrial origins, rather than from a civilization that existed on Earth.[39]

In 1970, von Däniken admitted that the Nazca markings “could have been laid out on their gigantic scale by working from a model using a system of coordinates.”[40]

Zecharia Sitchin

Zecharia Sitchin’s series The Earth Chronicles, beginning with The 12th Planet, revolves around Sitchin’s unique interpretation of ancient Sumerian and Middle Eastern texts, megalithic sites, and artifacts from around the world.[41][42] He hypothesizes that the gods of old Mesopotamia were astronauts from the planet “Nibiru“, which Sitchin states the Sumerians believed to be a remote “12th planet” (counting the Sun, Moon, and Pluto as planets) associated with the god Marduk. According to Sitchin, Nibiru continues to orbit the Sun on a 3,600-year elongated orbit. Modern astronomy has found no evidence to support Sitchin’s ideas.[41]

Sitchin argues that there are Sumerian texts that tell the story that 50 Anunnaki, inhabitants of a planet named Nibiru, came to Earth approximately 400,000 years ago with the intent of mining raw materials, especially gold, for transport back to Nibiru. With their small numbers they soon grew tired of the task and set out to genetically engineer laborers to work the mines. After much trial and error they eventually created Homo sapiens sapiens: the “Adapa” (model man) or Adam of later mythology. Sitchin contended the Anunnaki were active in human affairs until their culture was destroyed by global catastrophes caused by the abrupt end of the last ice age some 12,000 years ago. Seeing that humans survived and all they had built was destroyed, the Anunnaki left Earth after giving humans the opportunity and means to govern themselves. Sitchin’s work has not received mainstream scholarly support and has been roundly criticized by professionals that have reviewed his hypotheses. Semitic languages scholar Michael S. Heiser says that many of Sitchin’s translations of Sumerian and Mesopotamian words are not consistent with Mesopotamian cuneiform bilingual dictionaries, produced by ancient Akkadian scribes.[43][44][45]

Alan F. Alford, author of Gods of the New Millennium (1996), was an adherent of the ancient astronaut hypothesis. Much of his work draws on Sitchin’s hypotheses. However, he now finds fault with Sitchin’s hypothesis after deeper analysis, stating that: “I am now firmly of the opinion that these gods personified the falling sky; in other words, the descent of the gods was a poetic rendition of the cataclysm myth which stood at the heart of ancient Near Eastern religions.”[46]

Robert Temple

Robert K. G. Temple’s 1976 book, The Sirius Mysteryargues that the Dogon people of northwestern Mali preserved an account of extraterrestrial visitation from around 5,000 years ago. He quotes various lines of evidence, including advanced astronomical knowledge inherited by the tribe, descriptions, and comparative belief systems with ancient civilizations such as ancient Egypt and Sumer. His work draws heavily on the studies of cultural anthropologists Marcel Griaule and Germaine Dieterlen.[47]

His conclusions have been criticized by scientists, who point out discrepancies within Temple’s account, and suggested that the Dogon may have received some of their astronomical information recently, probably from European sources, and may have misrepresented Dogon ethnography.[48][49][50]

UFO religions

Various new religious movements including some branches of theosophyScientologyRaëlismAetherius Society, and Heaven’s Gate believe in ancient and present-day contact with extraterrestrial intelligence. Many of these faiths see both ancient scriptures and recent revelations as connected with the action of aliens from other planetary systems. Psychologists have found that UFO religions have similarities which suggest that members of these groups consciously or subliminally associate enchantment with the memes of science fiction.[51]

Claims of proponents

Rama being welcomed upon his return to Ayodhya in king Ravana‘s flying chariot Pushpaka Vimana

Among scientists, the consensus is that the ancient astronaut hypothesis is not impossible, but unjustified and unnecessary. The “mysteries” cited as evidence for the hypothesis can be explained without having to invoke ancient astronauts; proponents look for mysteries where none exist.[9] Since ancient astronauts are unnecessary, Occam’s razor should be applied and the hypothesis rejected according to the scientific consensus.[52]

Ancient religious texts

Proponents cite ancient mythologies to support their viewpoints based on the idea that ancient creation myths of gods who descend from the heavens to Earth to create or instruct humanity are representations of alien visitors, whose superior technology accounts for their perception as gods. Proponents draw an analogy to occurrences in modern time when isolated cultures are exposed to advanced technology, such as when, in the early 20th century, “cargo cults” were discovered in the South Pacific: cultures who believed various Western ships and their cargo to be sent from the gods as fulfillment of prophecies concerning their return.[53][user-generated source?]

The ancient Sumerian myth of Enûma Eliš, inscribed on cuneiform tablets and part of the Library of Ashurbanipal, says humankind was created to serve gods called the “Annunaki“. Hypothesis proponents believe that the Annunaki were aliens who came to Earth to mine gold for their own uses. According to the hypothesis proponents, the Annunaki realized mining gold was taking a toll on their race, and then created the human race as slaves.[54]

Ramayana

In Hindu mythologythe gods and their avatars travel from place to place in flying vehicles called Vimana. There are many mentions of these flying objects in the Ramayana, which used by the Lankan king Ravana from Sri Lanka dates to the 5th or 4th century BCE. Below are some examples:

From Book 6, Canto CXXIII: The Magic Car:[55]

Is not the wondrous chariot mine,

Named Pushpak, wrought by hands divine.

This chariot, kept with utmost care,
Will waft thee through the fields of air,
And thou shalt light unwearied down

In fair Ayodhyá’s royal town.

From Book 6, Canto CXXIV: The Departure:[55]

Swift through the air, as Ráma chose,

The wondrous car from earth arose.
And decked with swans and silver wings

Bore through the clouds its freight of kings.

Erich von Däniken discusses the Ramayana and the vimanas in Chapter 6 of Chariots of the Gods? suggesting that they were “space vehicles”. To support his hypothesis, he offers a quotation which he says is from an 1889 translation of the Mahabharata by C. Roy: “Bhima flew with his Vimana on an enormous ray which was as brilliant as the sun and made a noise like the thunder of a storm”.[56][57]

Book of Genesis and Book of Enoch

The Book of Genesis, Chapter 6 verses 1–2 and 4, states:

When human beings began to increase in number on the earth and daughters were born to them, the sons of God saw that the daughters of humans were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose.

The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward—when the sons of God went to the daughters of humans and had children by them.
– Genesis 6:1–4 (New International Version)

Many Christians consider these groups to be the different families of Adam and Eve’s children. Another interpretation is that the Nephilim are the children of the “sons of God” and “daughters of humans”, although scholars are uncertain.[58] The King James Version translates “Nephilim” as “giants” (or Gibborim). Ancient Astronaut proponents argue that Adam and Eve ate of the forbidden fruit in order “to be godlike”, and this was the first step in human evolution.[citation needed]

The first part of the apocryphal Book of Enoch expands and interprets Genesis 6:1: that the “sons of God” were a group of 200 “angels” called “Watchers“, who descended to Earth to breed with humans. Their offspring are the Nephilim, “giants” who “consumed all the acquisitions of men”. When humans could no longer sustain the Nephilim, they turned against humanity. The Watchers also instructed humans in metallurgy and metalworkingcosmeticssorceryastrologyastronomy, and meteorology. God then ordered the Watchers to be imprisoned in the ground, and created the Great Flood (or the numerous Deluge myths) to rid Earth of the Nephilim and of the humans given knowledge by the Watchers. To ensure humanity’s survival, Noah is forewarned of the oncoming destruction. Because they disobeyed God, the book describes the Watchers as “fallen angels“.[59][original research?]

Some ancient astronaut proponents argue that this story is a historical account of extraterrestrials visiting Earth, called Watchers because their mission was to observe humanity. Some of the extraterrestrials disobeyed orders; they made contact with humans, cross-bred with human females, and shared knowledge with them. The Nephilim were thus half-human-half-extraterrestrial hybrids.[60][better source needed]

Chuck Missler and Mark Eastman argue that modern UFOs carry the fallen angels, or offspring of fallen angels, and that “Noah’s genealogy was not tarnished by the intrusion of fallen angels. It seems that this adulteration of the human gene pool was a major problem on the planet earth”.[61]

Von Däniken also suggests that the two angels who visited Lot in Genesis 19 were ancient astronauts, who used atomic weapons to destroy the city of Sodom.[62]

Marc Dem reinterprets the Book of Genesis by writing that humanity started on another planet and that the God of the Bible is an extraterrestrial.[63]

Book of Ezekiel

An engraved illustration of Ezekiel’s ‘vision’ (1670)

Chapter 1 of the Book of Ezekiel recounts a vision in which Ezekiel sees “an immense cloud” that contains fire and emits lightning and “brilliant light”. It continues: “The center of the fire looked like glowing metal, and in the fire was what looked like four living creatures”. These creatures, called cherubim, are described as winged and humanoid, they “sped back and forth like flashes of lightning” and “fire moved back and forth among the creatures”. The passage goes on to describe four shiny objects, called ophanim, each appearing “like a wheel intersecting a wheel”. These objects could fly and they moved with the creatures: “When the living creatures moved, the wheels beside them moved; and when the living creatures rose from the ground, the wheels also rose”.[64][original research?]

In Chapter 4 of Chariots of the Gods?, entitled “Was God an Astronaut?”, von Däniken suggests that Ezekiel had seen a spaceship or spaceships; this hypothesis had been put forward by Morris Jessup in 1956[65] and by Arthur W. Orton in 1961.[66] A detailed version of this hypothesis was described by Josef F. Blumrich in his book The Spaceships of Ezekiel (1974).[67]

Elsewhere in the Bible

The characteristics of the Ark of the Covenant and the Urim and Thummim have been said to suggest high technology, perhaps from alien origins.[68]

Robert Dione and Paul Misraki published books in the 1960s describing the events in the Bible as caused by alien technology.[69][70] Barry Downing, a Presbyterian minister, wrote a book in 1968 arguing that Jesus was an extraterrestrial, citing John 8:23 and other biblical verses as evidence.[71]

Some ancient astronaut proponents such as Von Däniken and Barry Downing believe that the concept of hell in the Bible could be a real description of the planet Venus brought to Earth by extraterrestrials showing photos of the hot surface on Venus to humans.[citation needed] Proponents of the hypothesis state that ‘God‘ and ‘Satan‘ were aliens that disagreed on whether or not human beings should be allowed the information that is offered by the tree of knowledge. David Childress, a leading proponent of ancient astronaut creation hypothesis, compares this story to the Greek tale of Prometheus, who gave mankind the knowledge of fire. Ancient Astronaut proponents believe the biblical concept of Satan is based on a misunderstood visit by extraterrestrials. Erich von Däniken posited that the descendants of extraterrestrials had children with hominids, and this was referred to in the Bible as the “Original sin.” Von Däniken believes that the biblical great flood was punishment after an extraterrestrial ‘God’ discovered that earthbound, fallen angels were mating with ape-like early humans.[72]

Irish Book of Invasions

Childress and others have written that the passage in the Book of Invasions describing the arrival of the Tuatha Dé Danann in Ireland, records “the arrival of aliens in spacecraft with cloaking devices” at Slieve Anierin. The text states “so that they were the Tuatha De Danand who came to Ireland. In this wise they came, in dark clouds. They landed on the mountains of Conmaicne Rein in Connacht and they brought a darkness over the sun for three days and three nights”.[73]

Ancient artwork

Wondjina rock art in the Kimberley region, Australia

Worldwide petroglyphic evidence

Ancient astronaut proponents believe Hopi cave drawings of Kachinas (spirit beings) found in the desert link the origins of the Hopi and Zuni tribes with “star people”. They point to similar etchings elsewhere as evidence that extraterrestrials visited many different ancient civilizations.[citation needed]

Other artistic support for the ancient astronaut hypothesis has been sought in Palaeolithic cave paintingsWondjina in Australia and in the Rock Drawings in Valcamonica, in Italy (seen above) are said to bear a resemblance to present day astronauts.[74] Supporters of the ancient astronaut hypothesis sometimes argue that similarities such as dome shaped heads, interpreted as beings wearing space helmets, prove that early man was visited by an extraterrestrial race.[75]

Medieval and Renaissance art

More support of this hypothesis draws upon what are said to be representations of flying saucers and other unidentified flying objects in Medieval and Renaissance art.[76][user-generated source]

Some examples of these said objects include an ovoid shape in the sky of the painting Madonna con Bambino e San Giovannino (Madonna and Child with the Infant Saint John), an unidentified flying object in the Annunciazione (Annunciation) (1486) by Carlo Crivelli, a “spherical object with antennae” that appears similar to Sputnik in Bonaventura Salimbeni’s Santissima Trinita (Holy Trinity) (1595), and many such unidentified flying objects in Masolino Da Panicale’s Miracolo della neve (Miracle of the Snow) (1428). According to Italian art expert Diego Cuoghi, these objects contain religious symbolism behind them as most paintings of the time were of religious subjects. In such artworks, he says that angels and “radiant clouds” often appear in the sky. He says the object in the Madonna and Child is one of these radiant clouds, the object in the Annunciazione is a vortex of angels, the Sputnik-like object of Santissima Trinita is a globe representing creation with two sceptres held by God and Christ, and the Miracolo della neve contains many lenticular clouds.[77]

Nazca Lines

A large geoglyph near the Nazca Lines.

The ancient Nazca Lines are hundreds of huge ground drawings etched into the high desert of southern Peru. Some are stylized animals and humanoid figures, while others are merely straight lines hundreds of meters long. As the figures were made to be seen from a great height,[citation needed] they have been linked with the ancient astronaut hypothesis. In the 1970s, the pseudohistorical writer Erich von Däniken popularized a notion that the Nazca lines and figures could have been made “according to instructions from aircraft” and that the longer and wider lines might be runways for spacecraft. According to archaeologist Kenneth Feder, Von Däniken’s extraterrestrial interpretation is not supported by any evidence. Feder wrote that “the lines are interpreted by archaeologists as ceremonial pathways of the ancient Nazca people; they were used precisely in this way in the fairly recent past.”[78]

Joe Nickell of the University of Kentucky re-created one of the figures using only wooden stakes and string.[79]

Ancient artifacts

Ancient flying machines

Proponents of the ancient astronauts idea say some artifacts discovered in Egypt (the Saqqara Bird) and ColombiaEcuador (Quimbaya artifacts) are similar to modern planes and gliders.[80][81] These artifacts have been interpreted by mainstream archaeologists, however, as stylized representations of birds and insects.[citation needed]

Ancient structures and megalithic sites

Ahu Tongariki near Rano Raraku.

Proposed evidence for ancient astronauts includes the existence of ancient monuments and megalithic ruins such as the Giza pyramids of Egypt, Machu Picchu in Peru, or Baalbek in Lebanon, the Moai of Easter Island and Stonehenge of England.[82] Supporters say that these stone structures could not have been built with the technical abilities and tools of the people of the time and further argue that many could not be duplicated even today. They suggest that the large size of the building stones, the precision with which they were laid, and the distances many were transported leaves the question open as to who constructed these sites.[citation needed]

These ideas are categorically rejected by mainstream archeology. Some mainstream archeologists have participated in experiments to move large megaliths. These experiments have succeeded in moving megaliths up to at least 40 tons,[83][84] and some have speculated that with a larger workforce larger megaliths could be towed with the use of known ancient technology.[85]

Pyramids of Egypt

Von Däniken states that ancient Egypt, with its great structures of the Giza pyramid complex such as the Great Pyramid of Giza and the Great Sphinx of Giza, became a “fantastic, ready-made civilization” suddenly and without transitions and development.[86] Ancient astronaut proponents suggest that sites like the pyramids of Giza were instead constructed by extraterrestrials.[87][88] However, archaeological evidence demonstrates not only the long cultural trajectory of prehistoric Egypt but also the developmental processes the ancient Egyptians underwent.[88] Egyptian tombs began with important leaders of villages being buried in the bedrock and covered with mounds of earth. Eventually, the first pharaohs had tombs covered with single-story, mud-brick, square structures called mastabas. The stepped pyramid developed out of multiple mastabas being stacked on each one in one structure. This led to the construction of pharaoh Djoser‘s Step Pyramid at Saqqara, which is known from records to have been built by the ancient Egyptian architect and advisor Imhotep.[89] It was pharaoh Sneferu who had his pyramid transitioned from a stepped to a true pyramid like the well-known pyramids of Giza.[90] A papyrus document like a logbook kept by an official called inspector Merer has also been discovered with records of the construction of the Great Pyramid.[91]

Moai

The Moai statues of Easter Island were moved miles from the Rano Raraku quarry to their current locations, and archaeologists have wondered how massive statues such as these could have been transported.[92] The folklore of the native Rapa Nui people says that chiefs and priests used mana to make the statues of the island walk.[93] In 1982, Czech engineer Pavel Pavel and a group of sixteen people used a replica concrete moai to test a method that could have transported the statues. They tied ropes to it and in two groups pulled and twisted it back and forth, making it move forward in a walking motion. They called it the “refrigerator method” and demonstrated that the massive statues could be easily moved by a small group of people.[94]

Religious and cultural practices

A physiologically manipulated Paracas skull (housed at the Museo Regional de Ica in Peru)

A number of ancient cultures, such as the ancient Egyptians and some Native Americans, artificially lengthened the skulls of their children. Some ancient astronaut proponents propose that this was done to emulate extraterrestrial visitors, whom they saw as gods.[95][96]

Akenaten

Among the ancient rulers depicted with elongated skulls are pharaoh Akhenaten and Nefertiti. The depiction of Akhenaten and his family with traits like elongated skulls, limbs, underdeveloped torsos, and gynecomastia in Amarna art is hypothesized to be the effect of a familial disease.[97][98] Marriage between family members, especially siblings, was common in ancient Egyptian royal families, elevating the risk of such disorders.[99][98] Studies on the remains of the ruling family of 18th Dynasty Egypt have found evidence of deformities and illnesses.[98] Proposed syndromes of Akhenaten include Loeys-Dietz syndromeMarfan’s syndromeFrohlich syndrome, and Antley-Bixler syndrome.[97][98] Akhenaten worshipped the sun disk god Aten and it is suggested that such worship could point to a disease that is alleviated by sunlight.[100][101]

In popular culture

Ancient astronauts have been addressed frequently in science fiction and horror fiction in many different media. In a 2004 article in Skeptic magazine, Jason Colavito writes that von Däniken borrowed many of the book’s concepts from Le Matin des Magiciens (Morning of the Magicians), that this book in turn was heavily influenced by the Cthulhu Mythos, and that the core of the ancient astronaut hypothesis originates in H. P. Lovecraft‘s works “The Call of Cthulhu” and At the Mountains of Madness.[102] Colavito later expanded on this idea in his book The Cult of Alien Gods: H. P. Lovecraft and Extraterrestrial Pop Culture.

The idea that aliens visited Earth in the past is frequently seen in works of fiction. For example, the comic book Thor considers that all the Norse mythology is based on actual beings living in other dimensions, who were worshipped as gods by the Vikings and who reappear on Earth in modern times. Däniken’s work, however, inspired several works and franchises over time, such as EternalsStargateIndiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal SkullPrometheus and The X-Files. All those works do not take the idea seriously, but merely use it as a narrative device.[103] Another angle may be to leave the aliens out of the story, and focus instead on devices they left behind, as in the novels Scarlet DreamGalactic DerelictWorld of PtavvsToolmaker Koan, and A Fire Upon the Deep.[104] Aliens may also appear as an elder race that created or shepherded humans in their early times; and may or may not be present in the work’s present day.[105]

Ancient Aliens is a television series that features proponents of the ancient astronaut hypothesis, such as Giorgio A. TsoukalosDavid Childress, Erich von Däniken, Steven M. Greer, and Nick Pope.[106][failed verification]

Proponents

Many publications have argued for the ancient astronauts hypotheses. Notable examples include these:

See also

References

  1. Jump up to:a b c d e f Lieb, Michael (1998), “The Psycho-pathology of the Bizarre”Children of Ezekiel: Aliens, UFOs, the Crisis of Race, and the Advent of End TimeDurham, North Carolina and LondonDuke University Press, pp. 51–54, 249–251, doi:10.2307/j.ctv11sn0vx.6ISBN 978-0-8223-2137-8OCLC 9354231
  2. Jump up to:a b c d e Hammer, Olav; Swartz, Karen (2021), “Ancient Aliens”, in Zeller, Ben (ed.), Handbook of UFO Religions, Brill Handbooks on Contemporary Religion, vol. 20, Leiden and BostonBrill Publishers, pp. 151–177, doi:10.1163/9789004435537_008ISBN 978-90-04-43437-0ISSN 1874-6691S2CID 243018663
  3. ^ May, Andrew (2016), Pseudoscience and Science Fiction (illustrated ed.), HeidelbergSpringer Verlag, p. 133, Bibcode:2017psf..book…..MISBN 978-3-319-42605-1
  4. Jump up to:a b c Vetterling-Braggin, Mary (1983), “The Ancient Astronaut Hypothesis: Science or Pseudoscience?”, in Grim, Patrick (ed.), Philosophy of Science and the Occult (1st ed.), Albany, New YorkState University of New York Press, pp. 278–288, ISBN 978-0-87395-572-0archived from the original on March 19, 2024, retrieved July 26, 2021
  5. ^ Cithara, vol. 1, Literary Licensing, LLC, November 1961, p. 12, ISBN 1258674610archived from the original on February 20, 2022, retrieved June 8, 2019
  6. ^ Rathje, William (January–February 1978), “The Ancient Astronaut Myth”, Archaeology31 (1), New York: Archaeological Institute of America: 4–7, ISSN 0003-8113JSTOR 41726852
  7. ^ Cole, John R. (1980), “Cult Archaeology and Unscientific Method and Theory”, in Schiffer, Michael B. (ed.), Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 3, Cambridge, MassachusettsAcademic Press, pp. 1–33, doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-003103-0.50006-XISBN 978-0-12-003103-0JSTOR 20170153S2CID 142959012
  8. ^ Harrold; “Noah’s Ark and Ancient Astronauts: Pseudoscientific Beliefs About the Past Among a Sample of College Students;” The Skeptical Inquirer; vol 11.1; 1986: 61; Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal; December 13, 2010.
  9. Jump up to:a b Hines. T. Pseudoscience and the Paranormal. Prometheus Books, 2003. p. 304
  10. Jump up to:a b Bond, Sarah E. (November 13, 2018). “Pseudoarchaeology and the Racism Behind Ancient Aliens”HyperallergicArchived from the original on July 19, 2023. Retrieved July 11, 2023.
  11. Jump up to:a b “Close encounters of the racist kind”Southern Poverty Law CenterArchived from the original on March 19, 2024. Retrieved July 11, 2023.
  12. ^ Gromacki, Gary (2012), “Ancient Aliens or Demonic Deception?”Journal of Ministry & Theology16 (2), archived from the original on November 29, 2022, retrieved July 11, 2016
  13. ^ Lewis, James R. (2012), “Excavating Tradition: Alternative Archaeologies as Legitimation Strategies”, Numen: International Review for the History of Religions, vol. 59, no. 2/3, pp. 202–221, doi:10.1163/156852712X630789
  14. ^ Grünschloß, Andreas (2007), “Ancient Astronaut Narrations. A Popular Discourse on Our Religious Past” (PDF)Fabula48 (3–4): 205–228, doi:10.1515/FABL.2007.018S2CID 163071861archived (PDF) from the original on October 5, 2016, retrieved July 11, 2016
  15. ^ Herrick, James A. (February 6, 2009), “The Men Behind the Myths: Erich von Däniken”Christianity Todayarchived from the original on November 29, 2022, retrieved July 11, 2016
  16. ^ Hiscock, Peter (2012), “Cinema, Supernatural Archaeology, and the Hidden Human Past”, Numen: International Review for the History of Religions, vol. 59, no. 2/3, pp. 156–177, doi:10.1163/156852712X630761
  17. ^ Hanegraaff, Wouter J. (2007), “Fiction in the Desert of the Real: Lovecraft’s Cthulhu Mythos”, Aries7 (1): 85–109, doi:10.1163/157005906X154728
  18. ^ Richter, Jonas (2012), “Traces of the Gods: Ancient Astronauts as a Vision of Our Future”Numen: International Review for the History of Religions, vol. 59, no. 2/3, pp. 222–248, doi:10.1163/156852712X630798archived from the original on November 29, 2022, retrieved June 29, 2019
  19. ^ Lewis, James R.; Andersson, Pia (2012), “Introduction (to special issue on alternative archeologies)”, Numen: International Review for the History of Religions, vol. 59, no. 2/3, pp. 119–124, doi:10.1163/156852712X630734
  20. ^ Olien, Michael D. (1978), “Did Ancient Astronauts Bring Civilization?”The Human Myth: An Introduction to Anthropology, USA: Harper & Row, pp. 236–241, 245, 255ISBN 0-06-044918-7
  21. ^ O’Hehir, Andrew (August 31, 2005), “Archaeology from the dark side”Salonarchived from the original on December 7, 2019, retrieved July 11, 2016
  22. ^ Killgrove, Kristina. “What Archaeologists Really Think About Ancient Aliens, Lost Colonies, And Fingerprints Of The Gods”ForbesArchived from the original on July 11, 2023. Retrieved July 11, 2023.
  23. Jump up to:a b Wade, Lizzie (April 12, 2019). “Beliefs in aliens, Atlantis are on the rise”Science364 (6436): 110–111. Bibcode:2019Sci…364..110Wdoi:10.1126/science.364.6436.110ISSN 0036-8075PMID 30975865S2CID 109940906Archived from the original on July 11, 2023. Retrieved July 11, 2023.
  24. ^ Rossi, Franco (2021). “Reckoning with the Popular Uptake of Alien Archaeology”Public Archaeology18 (3): 162–183. doi:10.1080/14655187.2021.1920795S2CID 237124510Archived from the original on October 10, 2022. Retrieved June 28, 2023.
  25. ^ “”Ancient Aliens”: A Damaging Perspective”The Liberator Magazine. February 28, 2019. Archived from the original on July 11, 2023. Retrieved July 11, 2023.
  26. ^ Burns (Hopkins), Ruth, a.k.a. Cankudutawin (Red Road Woman) (August 8, 2023). “Ancient Ties: Indigenous Peoples and the Extraterrestrial”AtmosArchived from the original on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
  27. ^ “7 Ancient Sites Some People Think Were Built by Aliens”National Geographic. November 11, 2017. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
  28. ^ Stothers, Richard (2007). “Unidentified Flying Objects in Classical Antiquity”The Classical Journal103 (1): 79–92. ISSN 0009-8353JSTOR 30038660Archived from the original on April 8, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
  29. ^ Sagan (2011), pp. 65–68, 79.
  30. ^ “Envisioning Martian Civilizations”Library of CongressArchived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023In the story the Martians were 14 feet tall and had advanced enough technology that they had visited the Earth 9,000 years earlier.
  31. ^ Card 2018: p. 249
  32. ^ Williams, William F. (2013). Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience: From Alien Abductions to Zone Therapy. Routledge. ISBN 9781135955229 – via Google Books.
  33. ^ Shklovskii & Sagan (1966), pp. 448–464 Chapter 33: “The Possible Consequences of Direct Contact”
  34. ^ Sagan, Carl (1980). Broca’s Brain: Reflections on the Romance of Science. Ballantine Books. ISBN 978-0345336897Archived from the original on March 19, 2024. Retrieved July 11, 2018 – via Google Books.
  35. ^ Shklovskii & Sagan (1966).
  36. ^ “Erich von Däniken’s Chariots of the Gods?: Science or Charlatanism?” Archived August 24, 2019, at the Wayback Machine; Robert Sheaffer. Via Debunker.com; originally published in NICAP UFO Investigator, October/November 1974
  37. ^ Clifford Wilson, Crash Go the Chariots, Lancer Books, 1972[page needed][ISBN missing]
  38. ^ von Däniken, Erich (1968). Chariots of the Gods?. G.P. Putnam Sons. p. 17.
  39. ^ Feder, Kenneth (2018), Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries, Oxford Press, pp. 189–206, ISBN 978-0190629656
  40. ^ Feder, Kenneth (April 15, 2013). Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries (PDF) (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. p. 224. ISBN 978-0078035074. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 6, 2019. Retrieved October 6, 2019.
  41. Jump up to:a b Carroll, Robert T (1994–2009), “The Skeptic’s Dictionary”Zecharia Sitchin and The Earth Chronicles, John Wiley & Sons, archived from the original on September 20, 2019, retrieved January 5, 2013
  42. ^ Kilgannon, Corey (January 8, 2010), “Origin of the Species, From an Alien View”The New York Timesarchived from the original on November 12, 2020, retrieved October 29, 2010Mr. Sitchin was called silly before—by scientists, historians and archaeologists who dismiss his hypotheses as pseudoscience and fault their underpinnings—his translations of ancient texts and his understanding of physics.
  43. ^ “Open Letter to Zecharia Sitchin”stichiniswrong.comarchived from the original on October 5, 2011, retrieved October 5, 2011
  44. ^ Pilkington, Mark (August 2003), “Zechariah Sitchin”Fortean Times, archived from the original on April 3, 2013
  45. ^ “The Anunnaki”stichiniswrong.comarchived from the original on October 14, 2012, retrieved January 5, 2013
  46. ^ Ancient Astronauts, Eridu.co.uk, archived from the original on July 17, 2011, retrieved June 18, 2011
  47. ^ Temple, Robert K. G., The Sirius Mystery, 1976. ISBN 0-09-925744-0
  48. ^ Sagan (2011).
  49. ^ Ian Ridpath (1978), “Investigating the Sirius ‘Mystery'”Skeptical Inquirer, archived from the original on February 16, 2008, retrieved October 13, 2007
  50. ^ van Beek, Walter E. A. (1991), “Dogon Restudied: A Field Evaluation of the Work of Marcel Griaule”, Current Anthropology, vol. 32, pp. 139–167, doi:10.1086/203932S2CID 224796672
  51. ^ Partridge, C.H. (2003), UFO religions, Routledge, ISBN 978-0-415-26324-5
  52. ^ Carroll, R. T. The Skeptic’s Dictionary: A Collection of Strange Beliefs, Amusing Deceptions, and Dangerous Delusions. Wiley, 2003. pp. 21–22[ISBN missing]
  53. ^ “Cargo Cults” Archived November 28, 2012, at the Wayback Machine; SJSU.edu
  54. ^ Mark, Joshua J. (May 4, 2018), “Enuma Elish – The Babylonian Epic of Creation – Full Text”World History Encyclopediaarchived from the original on April 23, 2021, retrieved June 9, 2019
  55. Jump up to:a b Rámáyan of Válmíki. Translated by Ralph T. H. Griffith. Archived from the original on April 12, 2018. Retrieved March 11, 2014 – via Sacred-Texts.com.
  56. ^ von Däniken, Erich; Chariots of the Gods?; “Chapter 6: Ancient Imagination and Legends or Ancient Facts?”; 1968.
  57. ^ “Vimanas”main.orgArchived from the original on February 10, 2010.
  58. ^ James Orr says “it is not easy to be certain of the interpretation of this strange passage.” “Nephilim,” The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, James Orr, ed., (Chicago: Howard-Severance, 1930), Vol. IV, p. 2133.
  59. ^ Book of Enoch (English and Swedish translations), Enoksbok.se, archived from the original on August 26, 2017, retrieved March 11, 2014
  60. ^ Ancient Aliens, Series 2 Episode 7: Angels and Aliens
  61. ^ Missler, Chuck, and Mark Eastman, Alien Encounters: The Secret Behind the UFO Phenomenon (Coeur d’Alene, ID: Koinonia House, 1997), 207.
  62. ^ von Däniken, 37. Le Poer Trench had previously speculated that a space vehicle had used nuclear weapons to destroy Sodom; Brinsley Le Poer Trench, The Sky People (New York: Award Books, 1970; copyright 1960, London) 64–65.
  63. ^ Gordon Stein, The encyclopedia of the paranormal, Prometheus Books, 1996 p. 29
  64. ^ Ezekiel 1, New International Version
  65. ^ von Daniken, 38–39. Morris K. JessupUFO and the Bible (New York: Citadel Press, 1956) 56–59.
  66. ^ Orton, Arthur W. (March 1961), The Four-Faced Visitors of Ezekiel, Analog Science Fact & Fiction, p. 99, archived from the original on March 29, 2015, retrieved March 29, 2015 – via e-text at Project Gutenberg
  67. ^ Josef F. Blumrich: The Spaceships of Ezekiel, Corgi Books, 1974.
  68. ^ AncientDimensions Mysteries: De-Coded: The Ark Of The Covenant, Farshores.org, archived from the original on July 26, 2011, retrieved June 18, 2011
  69. ^ Profile of Paul Misraki in UFOs in the 1980s by Jerome Clark, Apogee Books, 1990
  70. ^ Philip H. Melling, Fundamentalism in America: millennialism, identity and militant religion, 1999, p. 183
  71. ^ The Bible and Flying Saucers First Edition 1968. Second edition published in 1997 ISBN 1-56924-745-5
  72. ^ “Ancient Aliens and the Creation of Man”Ancient Aliens. November 24, 2011. 27:20 minutes in. History ChannelArchived from the original on March 9, 2014. Retrieved March 23, 2014.
  73. ^ Colavito (2015), pp. 94–95.
  74. ^ Cave paintings and locations such as Wondinja and are discussed in the book UFO: the continuing enigma, Reader’s Digest Association, 1991, ISBN 978-0895773975
  75. ^ UFO Evidence, Etcontact.net, archived from the original on March 28, 2014, retrieved March 11, 2014
  76. ^ Art and UFO – Part 5, Sprezzatura.it, November 23, 2002, archived from the original on July 22, 2011, retrieved June 18, 2011
  77. ^ Polidoro 2005
  78. ^ Feder, K. L. “Ancient Astronauts”. In Michael Shermer (Ed). The Skeptic Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience. ABC-CLIO. p. 19
  79. ^ The Mysterious Nazca Lines, Onagocag.com, August 7, 1982, archived from the original on July 15, 2011, retrieved June 18, 2011
  80. ^ Sommer 2012: p. 8
  81. ^ Strange Artifacts, Ancient Flying Machines, World Mysteries, December 17, 1903, archived from the original on June 14, 2011, retrieved June 18, 2011
  82. ^ Christopher Penczak, Ascension Magick: Ritual, Myth & Healing for the New Aeon, 2007, p. 226
  83. ^ NOVA | Transcripts | Secrets of Lost Empires | Stonehenge, PBS, February 11, 1997, archived from the original on August 30, 2017, retrieved June 18, 2011
  84. ^ NOVA Online | Mysteries of the Nile: The Third Attempt, Pbs.org, August 27, 1999, archived from the original on April 30, 2009, retrieved June 18, 2011
  85. ^ History Channel “Mega Movers: Ancient Mystery Moves”
  86. ^ Däniken 1972 cited in Feder 2020: p. 225
  87. ^ Card 2018: p. 82
  88. Jump up to:a b Feder 2020: p. 226
  89. ^ Feder 2020: pp. 227–228
  90. ^ Feder 2020: p. 229
  91. ^ Tallet and Marouard 2014: pp. 8–10
  92. ^ Hunt and Lipo 2011: p. 55
  93. ^ Hunt and Lipo 2011: p. 56
  94. ^ Hunt and Lipo 2011: p. 79
  95. ^ Kevin Burns (executive producer) (2011), Ancient Aliens, Series 3, Episode 8: Aliens and Lost Worlds (motion picture), A+E Networks
  96. ^ Vesco, Renato; Childress, David Hatcher (1994), Man-made UFOs 1944–1994 : 50 years of suppression (1st ed.), Stelle, IL: AUP Publishers Network, ISBN 0932813232OCLC 32056133
  97. Jump up to:a b Retief and Cilliers 2011
  98. Jump up to:a b c d Eshraghian and Loeys 2012: p. 661
  99. ^ Habicht and Henneberg 2015
  100. ^ Card 2018: p. 80
  101. ^ Eshraghian and Loeys 2012: p. 662
  102. ^ Colavito, Jason (2004), “Charioteer of the Gods”Skeptic, vol. 10, no. 4, archived from the original on August 2, 2016, retrieved July 6, 2018
  103. ^ Max Evry (November 5, 2021). “The Pseudoscience Classic That Inspired Eternals… and Many Other Movies”. IGN. Archived from the original on May 31, 2022. Retrieved May 16, 2022.
  104. ^ James Davis Nicoll (October 8, 2021). “Five SF Novels Featuring Ancient Alien Artifacts”. Tor. Archived from the original on August 13, 2022. Retrieved May 16, 2022.
  105. ^ Clute, John (1997). Elder Races. London: Orbit. Archived from the original on September 28, 2021. Retrieved August 16, 2021.
  106. ^ Ancient Aliens, History.com, June 14, 2011, archived from the original on July 4, 2011, retrieved June 18, 2011
  107. ^ Lhote, Henri (1903–1991), Daviddarling.info, February 1, 2007, archived from the original on April 6, 2016, retrieved June 18, 2011
  108. ^ Agrest, Matest (1961), КОСМОНАВТЫ ДРЕВНОСТИНА СУШЕ И НА МОРЕ (in Russian), Moscow, Geografgis, pp. 526–542
  109. ^ Cairns-Smith, A. G. (1975), “A Case for an Alien Ancestry”, Proceedings of the Royal Society B, vol. 189, no. 1095, pp. 249–274, Bibcode:1975RSPSB.189..249Cdoi:10.1098/rspb.1975.0056S2CID 83571446

Bibliography

Further reading

  • Avalos, Hector (2002), “The Ancient Near East in Modern Science Fiction: Zechariah Sitchin’s The 12th Planet as Case Study”, Journal of Higher Criticism, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 49–70
  • Fagan, Garrett G. (2006). Archaeological Fantasies: How Pseudoarchaeology Misrepresents the Past and Misleads the Public. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-30593-4
  • Harris, Christie. (1975). Sky Man on the Totem Pole?. New York: Atheneum.
  • Stiebing, William H. (1984). Ancient Astronauts, Cosmic Collisions and Other Popular Theories About Man’s Past. Prometheus Books. ISBN 0-87975-285-8
  • Story, Ronald. (1976). The Space Gods Revealed: A Close Look at the Theories of Erich von Däniken. Harper & Row. ISBN 0-06-014141-7
  • Trefil, James. (2007). “Who Were the Ancient Engineers of Egypt?”Skeptical Inquirer (Committee for Skeptical Inquiry) 17.1.
  • White, Peter. (1976). The Past Is Human: Debunking Von Daniken’s Gee-Whiz Theories. Taplinger.
1
0
Categories: Anunnaki
Anton Nieuwenhuizen

Written by:Anton Nieuwenhuizen All posts by the author

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Cookies Notice

Our website use cookies. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with this.
Spilling the Beans

You cannot copy content of this page

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x